Philosopher of law

2. Explain how the case (the Lavallee case) would be decided by John Stuart Mill.

John Stuart Mill is a philosopher and the quote that we are supposed to relate to the Lavallee case was "Actions are right in proportion to how they tend to create happiness; incorrect in proportion to how they tend to produce the opposite of happiness"

to explain question 2:

in this question, i) what would john Stuart Mill say about the Lavallee case? would he agree with the supreme court and the decision or disagree?

in question ii) why would he disagree or agree with the Supreme Court's decision?

But relate to his view on law and philosophy. Which it says in the quote he said "Actions are right in proportion to how they tend to create happiness; incorrect in proportion to how they tend to produce the opposite of happiness."

https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/599/index.do - Lavallee case

(i) In this case, what would JohnStuart Mill's specific final verdict

and sentence be?

Would he agree or disagree with the Supreme Court's final decision in this case?

(ii) Why would this be his final ruling? What are his ideas about

law/justice and how do theyapplyspecifically to the details of

this case?