Pick one (1) of the cases linked in the Unit 6 folder (Metromedia, Discovery Network, Edenfield, Rubin, 44 Liquormart,ORLorillard), and list out a short case brief about it. APPLY the elements of the four-partCentral Hudsontest. LIST EACH element and DISCUSS THE FACTS for EACH ELEMENT.In addition to applying each element, discuss what the government could have done to make its regulations constitutional (or more clearly constitutional).Specifically, what could the government have done to make a better "fit" between the regulation and the alleged government interest it was trying to support with that regulation? For example, in Central Hudson, the government wanted to dissuade consumers from wasting energy. But instead of banning all advertisements by energy producers, it could have made the energy producers include in their advertisements a disclaimer (e.g., one saying, remember, keep your energy rates down, turn off lights when you're not using them, and helps us all conserve our energy resources). Points awarded for quoting (accurately) the language from the court's opinion (that you selected) that support your analysis.

Here is the case I have chosen

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/507/410/

Please use that link for the case.

Here is the four part test for the central Hudson test

1. Does the speech concern unlawful activities or is it misleading?

2. Is the asserted government interest in regulating speech substantial?

3. Does the regulation directly advance the interest asserted by the government?

4. Is the regulation no more extensive than is necessary to serve that interest.

Sorry for the long question I am struggling with this class and need some help :)