Pinky enters into a contract with Best Western to stay in their hotel for 2 nights. Pinky is a minor, and does not turn 18 until next year. If Pinky decides after the first night that he does not want to stay for the second night, and Best Western has a policy that Pinky must pay for 100% of his original booking, what is the best argument that either party can make?

Group of answer choices

1-Best Western can argue that its policy is reasonable and that Pinky had knowledge of the terms before he stayed in the hotel

2-Pinky can argue that the contract is void because he is a minor

3-Pinky can argue that the contract is voidable because he is a minor

4-Best Western can argue that the contract is enforceable because both parties signed the deal