please answer .,.,.,.,all the parts of the question within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner , Attempt the answer only if your are 100% sure that its correct. else leave it for other tutor otherwise i will give negative ratings and will also report your answer for unprofessionalism. Make sure the answer is 100% correct and is not copied from anywhere. ATTEMPT THE QUESTION ONLY IF YOU ARE 100% CORRECT AND SURE. ELSE LEAVE IT FOR ANOTHER TUTOR. BUT PLEASE DONT PUT WRONG ANSWER ELSE I WILL REPORT.

Carlos Baez has brought a medical malpractice claim against Dr. Jones alleging that Dr. Jones was negligent in his performance of a routine surgical procedure and that as a result of that negligence, Baez has suffered permanent damage. Dr. Jones denies that he was negligent and contends that he performed the surgical procedure properly. The attorney for Mr. Baez has learned that Dr. Jones had been sued for medical malpractice three times prior to the lawsuit brought by Mr. Baez. Two of the previous medical malpractice lawsuits brought against Dr. Jones were settled - one for $40,000.00 and the other for $125,000.00. The third prior lawsuit was dismissed by the court. The attorney for Mr. Baez wants to introduce evidence of these prior lawsuits against Dr. Jones. discuss whether the court should admit any of the proffered evidence of the past lawsuits against Dr. Jones. Are the prior lawsuits relevant? Do they help to prove that Dr. Jones was negligent in his performance of the surgery on Mr. Baez? Does it matter if all three of the prior lawsuits involved surgical procedures different from the one performed on Mr. Baez