please answer all the parts of the question within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner as in why the option is correct and why other options sre incorrect give reasons for the same , Attempt the answer only if your are 100% sure that its correct. else leave it for other tutor otherwise i will give negative ratings and will also report your answer for unprofessionalism. Make sure the answer is 100% correct and is not copied from anywhere. ATTEMPT THE QUESTION ONLY IF YOU ARE 100% CORRECT AND SURE. ELSE LEAVE IT FOR ANOTHER TUTOR. BUT PLEASE DONT PUT WRONG ANSWER ELSE I WILL REPORT.

Bobby Props LLC ("BPL") is a large props company formed in 1957, and Dreamy Drapeaux Corporation is a small, local flag manufacturer formed in 2015. These two businesses never had any dealings with each other until they recently entered into a contract, with terms all drafted by BPL The contract provides that BPL shall purchase 1,000 flags that Dreamy Drapeaux will specially design for BPL The contract further provides that BPL has the right to initiate, on a weekly basis, purchase orders of up to 100 flags until the contract's total number of flag purchases - 1,000 flags - has been met. Also, the contract includes a clause stating that BPL can cancel its obligation to pay for the remaining flags at any time if any Dreamy Drapeaux shipment does not arrive on the exact day as stated in a particular purchase order; this last provision is included in the contract even though time was of little importance to BPL The first shipment of 100 flags arrives a day late, and BPL decides to cancel the entire remainder of flags due, leaving Dreamy Drapeaux with 900 flags displaying Bobby's face. Dreamy Drapeaux does not have a secondary market in which to sell these flags and decides to offer BPL the flags at 30% of the initial price. What is Dreamy Drapeaux's best claim to enforce the original contract? O Unconscionablety. The clause that states BPL can cancel the order at any time if shipments arrive one day late is grossly unfair. O Promissory Estoppel. Dreamy Drapeaux needs the revenue from the original order to continue to operate and make flags. Incapacity. Dreamy Drapeaux is, in terms of its business experience, the status of a legal infant. O Undue Influence. BPL used its power to influence Dreamy Drapeaux to reduce the cost to 30% of the initial price. Breach of fiduciary duty. BPL had a fiduciary duty to handle the contractual relationships with proper ethics