Question
please answer all the questionss.,.within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner. else leave it for other tutor
please answer all the questionss.,.within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner. else leave it for other tutor otherwise i will give negative ratings and will also report your answer for unprofessionalism. Make sure the answer is 100% correct and IS NOT COPIED FROM ANYWHERE ELSE YOUR ANSWER WILL DOWNVOTED AND REPORTED STRAIGHTAWAY. USE YOUR OWN LANGUAGE WHILST WRITING.
ATTEMPT THE QUESTION ONLY IF YOU ARE 100% CORRECT AND SURE. ELSE LEAVE IT FOR ANOTHER TUTOR. BUT PLEASE DONT PUT WRONG ANSWER ELSE I WILL REPORT.
MAKE SURE THE ANSWER IS WELL EXPLAINED AND DETAILED.
SoulFood Pte Ltd [\"SF\"] was a company that specialised in creating juice cleanse lcits. It claimed to be the first juice cleanse company in Singapore with an AVA approved and licensed juice kitchen. SF was a joint venture between Daisy; Pose, Pansy and Violet; 4 good friends who believed in eating well. Daisy and Pose were also directors of SF. The 4 friends had wanted to make premium raw, organic, cold pressed juices accessible to everyone and therefore started SF. SF's constitution had an objects clause which stated that the company's object was the creation of quality juices and cleanse programmes that were nutritionally designed and certified. There were no other objects. The business was doing well but in the past yea r; sales started to slide. The directors of SF decided to boost the business by going into the food and beverage business. They were in the process of completing the purchase of a bistro in Orchard Road at a price of $200,000 and were contemplating purchasing another two cafes, one in Chinatown, and another in Katong. Pansy was completely against the idea of expanding into the food and beverage business because it was outside the scope of the company's objects clause. ta] dvise Pansy if the contract to purchase the bistro could be challenged on the grounds that it was outside the company's objects clause. In your answer, explain to Pansy, using cases and statutory provisions; the remedies she may have to prevent the contemplated purchase of the three food outlets. lb] Explain, with reference to the relevant sectionis}, howa company's objects clause could be amendedStep by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started