please answer all the questionss.,.within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner. else leave it for other tutor otherwise i will give negative ratings and will also report your answer for unprofessionalism. Make sure the answer is 100% correct and IS NOT COPIED FROM ANYWHERE ELSE YOUR ANSWER WILL DOWNVOTED AND REPORTED STRAIGHTAWAY. USE YOUR OWN LANGUAGE WHILST WRITING.

ATTEMPT THE QUESTION ONLY IF YOU ARE 100% CORRECT AND SURE. ELSE LEAVE IT FOR ANOTHER TUTOR. BUT PLEASE DONT PUT WRONG ANSWER ELSE I WILL REPORT.

MAKE SURE THE ANSWER IS WELL EXPLAINED AND DETAILED.

Case Study 4 [Chapter 6, page 135] \"Ethlcal Dilemma: Should Leadership Suuesslon-Plans Be Secret\" This is a thorny issue. If firms keep strategic workforce planning information about specific candidates' secret, planning may have limited value. Thus, at a software company, a senior executive on her way out the door fora president's job at a competitor was told that the firm had expected her to be its next president. Her response? \"If I'd known, I would have stayed.\" A somewhat different course of events transpired at another firm whose policy was to talk openly about prospective candidates. There, employees learned what the company had in mind for them over the next 3 to 5 years. Subseque ntly, when they did not get the jobs, they thought they were entitled to, employees felt betrayed. Some sued; others left. In your view, is it unethical to share planning information with employees and then not follow the plan? Conversely, do employees have a right to see such information