please answer all the questionss.,.within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner as in why the chosen option is right and why other options are wrong. else leave it for other tutor otherwise i will give negative ratings and will also report your answer for unprofessionalism. Make sure the answer is 100% correct and IS NOT COPIED FROM ANYWHERE ELSE YOUR ANSWER WILL DOWNVOTED AND REPORTED STRAIGHTAWAY. USE YOUR OWN LANGUAGE WHILST WRITING.

ATTEMPT THE QUESTION ONLY IF YOU ARE 100% CORRECT AND SURE. ELSE LEAVE IT FOR ANOTHER TUTOR. BUT PLEASE DONT PUT WRONG ANSWER ELSE I WILL REPORT.

22. Bad Bob was accused of murder; specifically the state alleged he killed his wife. He was tried for murder. He was acquitted. Eight years later, a second murder charge was brought against Bad Bob. This time the state said Bob killed his half-brother, Happy Harold. Bob said the charge of murdering Harold violated the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment. Who wins? A. Bad Bob. The double jeopardy clause prohibits a person from being tried for the same crime twice. This is a second murder charge. B. Bad Bob. Double jeopardy requires the state produce twice as much evidence as is normally required and it can't do that. C. State. The statute of limitations on the double jeopardy clause is five years. It doesn't apply. D. State. Double jeopardy applies to a crime, not to separate crimes. Since the state is charging Bob with the murder of a different person, the double jeopardy clause isn't implicated