please answer all the questionss.,.within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner as in why the chosen option is right and why other options are wrong. else leave it for other tutor otherwise i will give negative ratings and will also report your answer for unprofessionalism. Make sure the answer is 100% correct and IS NOT COPIED FROM ANYWHERE ELSE YOUR ANSWER WILL DOWNVOTED AND REPORTED STRAIGHTAWAY. USE YOUR OWN LANGUAGE WHILST WRITING.

ATTEMPT THE QUESTION ONLY IF YOU ARE 100% CORRECT AND SURE. ELSE LEAVE IT FOR ANOTHER TUTOR. BUT PLEASE DONT PUT WRONG ANSWER ELSE I WILL REPORT.

Make sure all the options whether correct or incorrect are explained properly.

2. Zelda is walking down the sidewalk. As she passes the local pub, a stack of beer barrels collapses and roll into Zelda. Zeida sues the pub, alleging negligence. The pub's defense is that she can't prove the necessary elements of negligence. Who wins? A. Pub. The pub has no obligation to the passing public to stack its barrels carefully. 8. Pub. Zelda cannot prove that the barrels were stacked negligently, nor can she prove that the fall of the kegs was caused by an act of the pub. C. Zelda. By stacking the barrels outside, the pub is strictly liable for injury caused by then D. Zelda. Zelda can prove the pub owned and retained control of the barrels. By invoking the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, Zelda need not prove specic acts of negligence