please answer based on law perspective this is for course LAW1702

A woman from British Columbia, Saliha Alnoor, recently sued Colgate-Palmolive, alleging that she was injured by a defective toothbrush. She stated that the toothbrush snapped as she was brushing her teeth, which injured her gums and caused them to bleed profusely. Alnoor claimed that she had endured permanent injury and sought damages, including $94000 in anticipated treatments. Colgate denied any wrongdoing. Soon after the trial began, the judge made several rulings against Alnoor, who was self-represented. Alnoor later agreed to drop her claim in response to Colgate's offer to waive legal costs against her (estimated at about $30000) if she did so. According to theNational Post, Alnoor's brother stated as follows: "We spent $21 000 on lawyers and experts, but we have no regrets. Now we know how justice works. Now we are much wiser."

Do you agree with Colgate's approach to Alnoor's litigation? What are the risks Colgate faced from the litigation? What are Alnoor's risks?