Please answer each of the following questions. In doing so, please state the rule, law, statute, legal theory, or precedent that you used in arriving at your answer. You do not have to answer in complete sentences, but yes or no answers (without explanation) will receive no credit.

1. Maeby lists a rare gold and diamond designer necklace for sale on an online auction site. Maeby sells the necklace for $25,000, but sends the auction winner a fake necklace, rather than the authentic one she originally listed. What, if any, crimes is Maeby guilty?
2. Lindsay is crossing the street when she is struck by Gob, who is riding a scooter while blindfolded. The crash caused Lindsay to fall to the ground and break her wrist. While waiting for a taxi to take her to the emergency room, Lindsay sustains head injuries when she is struck by a flying drone. Is Gob liable for Lindsay's head injuries? Why or why not? (Be sure to use specific legal terminology in your answer for full credit.)
3. Lucille owns Klimpy's Filthy Diner, a novelty restaurant where patrons delight in being voluntarily mistreated and cursed at by the unusually rude waitstaff. Lucille wants to attract more customers, so she seeks a permit for a billboard on a nearby interstate. The proposed billboard design contains with numerous obscene gestures and words. If the state denies Lucille's billboard design and Lucille sues, what is the likely result?
4. George operates a coffee shop. He is in constant competition with Oscar, who runs a neighboring coffee shop. In order to gain an advantage, George hires an employee to stand on the public sidewalk in front of Oscar's coffee shop, giving out free samples of George's coffee and inviting Oscar's customers to George's shop, noting that George beats Oscar's prices and quality. What, if anything, can Oscar do to stop George?
5. Ice is driving his motorcycle down the highway when his front tire explodes, causing him to lose control of the vehicle. Although the tire was fairly new, the inside wall of the tire was thinner than it should have been, which caused the tire to rupture at a high speed. What legal theory would Ice's attorney be most likely use to seek damages from the tire company?