Please answer in context of the Australian laws only with proper application mentioned of the case law applied Ronnie is a board game enthusiast and the creator and managing director of League of Pro Gamers Pty Ltd (LPG) Every year, Ronnie goes to Romania to attend the International Convention of Board Game Players, where she meets other board game aficionados, sees the many exhibitions, and plays various board games She generally returns with new or collector board games that she has acquired and then resells to her clients at a profit as part of LPG's inventory LPG also publishes a free newsletter with news on board games and goods This newsletter is sent to members of the LPG's customer loyalty programme This year, Ronnie purchased an exquisite chess set that was originally held by Emperor Louis IV of the Armani Empire, according to the vendor In the most recent issue of the newsletter, Ronnie included the following entry Gamers, here is a unique and uncommon opportunity The chess board and pieces of Emperor Louis IV This piece of history cost $25,000 to purchase Drake is a well heeled collector of rare historical artefacts He was in the bedroom of his son, Luke, who was a member of LPG's customer loyalty programme, and was offering him advise on getting an MBA Following his conversation with Luke, he spotted the LPG newsletter on his desk, which had been opened to the advertising part, and saw the article about the chess set Drake was well aware that the Louis IV chess set was a highly sought after historical item However, he believed that the chess set was in the possession of a Russian buyer and that it was worth more than $25,000 Nonetheless, he knew that displaying the set as part of his collection would make his business adversary and fellow antique collector, James Madison jealous Drake instantly took down the phone number from the advertising, scheduled a meeting with Ronnie, examined the chess set, and paid her Drake planned to throw a magnificent evening party and invited other well known antique collectors His biggest achievement was bringing James Madison over to show him the Louis IV chess set However, his victory was short lived as James said loudly to Drake and the gathering audience Oh, Drake, my darling Have you thoroughly investigated this That is not the chess set of Louis IV I now hold the Louis IV chess set and have the necessary authenticity paperwork to verify it Did you acquire this in a backstreet bazaar Drake's evening party ended in a dismal spectacle Sitting alone after everyone had departed, he suddenly felt a surge of rage and slammed the chess set against the wall As a consequence, the chess board was fractured and numerous chess pieces were severely damaged Drake took out his phone and dialled Ronnie's number He accused her of being responsible for his humiliation and wanted his money back Question Advise Ronnie of her legal position about the contract she made with Drake and if he (Drake) has the right to want his money back (you may also assume that Rooney did own the true Louis IV chess set) Please provide a detailed answer with IRAC ILAC format Marks Allocation Identification of at least four issues Identification of the source of the Australian law on each issue case law, statute Accurate explanation or justification of the relevant law on each issue Application of the relevant law to each issue Presentation and organisation of work in the format of IRAC and grammatically correct manner Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction Criteria No Pass 50 59 60 69 70 79 80 100 Issues are not Addresses most of Addresses most of Addresses most major and minor issues Addresses all of the major and minor issues Identification addressed or the issues but the major and of issues are addressed overlooks a few some minor issues (20 ) inappropriately minor ones Sources are not Overlooks or Identifies most of Addresses most of the major and minor issues and Addresses all the major and minor issues and Identification identified or are inappropriately the major and demonstrate a good understanding of the legal area demonstrate an in depth understanding of the legal of the source identified identifies a few of some minor area of the law on inappropriately the major sources sources each issue and some of the case law, minor sources statute (20 ) Does not give Gives a Gives a good Gives a very good explanation and demonstrate a Gives an excellent explanation and demonstrate an Accurate an accurate satisfactory explanation of the competent understanding of the substantive law relevant to in depth understanding of the substantive law of all explanation explanation of explanation of the relevant law on each issue the major and minor issue or the relevant law relevant law on each issue with justification on each issue each issue with some minor errors of the minor errors or or omissions relevant law omissions on each issue (25 ) Does not Presents coherent Presents coherent Presents and discusses very thoroughly a coherent Presents and discusses very thoroughly a coherent Application present a well application but argument on application of the law to major issues and can articulate application of the law to all major and minor issues of the argued does not address major issues with argument and or provide analysis using a range of materials and can effectively use critical skills, logic and relevant law application some significant some minor errors and be able to critically identify and address the inherent supporting materials to marshal arguments, address to each issue matters or omissions weaknesses in the arguments and counter arguments counter arguments and persuade the reader (25 ) Analysis is Analysis is Analysis is good Analysis is very good and well organised and flow is Analysis is outstanding, very well organised and flow Presentation poorly reasonably well and well organised effective with almost wholly correct spelling, grammar, is very effective with clearly written and and organised and organised and flow and flow is sentence structure and good referencing sophisticated use of language Very readable with organisation does not flow is adequate adequate with correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure and of work in a effectively sound referencing excellent referencing logical manner (10 )

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jun 21, 2024

Please answer in context of the Australian laws only with proper application mentioned of the case law applied. Ronnie is a board game enthusiast and

Please answer in context of the Australian laws only with proper application mentioned of the case law applied.

Ronnie is a board game enthusiast and the creator and managing director of League of Pro Gamers Pty Ltd. (LPG). Every year, Ronnie goes to Romania to attend the International Convention of Board Game Players, where she meets other board game aficionados, sees the many exhibitions, and plays various board games. She generally returns with new or collector board games that she has acquired and then resells to her clients at a profit as part of LPG's inventory. LPG also publishes a free newsletter with news on board games and goods. This newsletter is sent to members of the LPG's customer loyalty programme.

This year, Ronnie purchased an exquisite chess set that was originally held by Emperor Louis IV of the Armani Empire, according to the vendor. In the most recent issue of the newsletter, Ronnie included the following entry:

Gamers, here is a unique and uncommon opportunity! The chess board and pieces of Emperor Louis IV. This piece of history cost $25,000 to purchase.

Drake is a well-heeled collector of rare historical artefacts. He was in the bedroom of his son, Luke, who was a member of LPG's customer loyalty programme, and was offering him advise on getting an MBA. Following his conversation with Luke, he spotted the LPG newsletter on his desk, which had been opened to the advertising part, and saw the article about the chess set. Drake was well aware that the Louis IV chess set was a highly sought-after historical item. However, he believed that the chess set was in the possession of a Russian buyer and that it was worth more than $25,000. Nonetheless, he knew that displaying the set as part of his collection would make his business adversary and fellow antique collector, James Madison jealous. Drake instantly took down the phone number from the advertising, scheduled a meeting with Ronnie, examined the chess set, and paid her.

Drake planned to throw a magnificent evening party and invited other well-known antique collectors. His biggest achievement was bringing James Madison over to show him the Louis IV chess set. However, his victory was short-lived as James said loudly to Drake and the gathering audience:

"Oh, Drake, my darling! Have you thoroughly investigated this? That is not the chess set of Louis IV. I now hold the Louis IV chess set and have the necessary authenticity paperwork to verify it! "Did you acquire this in a backstreet bazaar?"

Drake's evening party ended in a dismal spectacle. Sitting alone after everyone had departed, he suddenly felt a surge of rage and slammed the chess set against the wall. As a consequence, the chess board was fractured and numerous chess pieces were severely damaged.

Drake took out his phone and dialled Ronnie's number. He accused her of being responsible for his humiliation and wanted his money back.

Question

Advise Ronnie of her legal position about the contract she made with Drake and if he (Drake) has the right to want his money back (you may also assume that Rooney did own the true Louis IV chess set). Please provide a detailed answer with IRAC/ILAC format.

Marks Allocation

Identification of at least four issues.
Identification of the source of the Australian law on each issue: case law, statute.
Accurate explanation or justification of the relevant law on each issue.
Application of the relevant law to each issue.
Presentation and organisation of work in the format of IRAC and grammatically correct manner

Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction Criteria No Pass 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-100% Issues are not Addresses most of Addresses most of Addresses most major and minor issues Addresses all of the major and minor issues Identification addressed or the issues but the major and of issues are addressed overlooks a few some minor issues (20%) inappropriately minor ones Sources are not Overlooks or Identifies most of Addresses most of the major and minor issues and Addresses all the major and minor issues and Identification identified or are inappropriately the major and demonstrate a good understanding of the legal area demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the legal of the source identified identifies a few of some minor area of the law on inappropriately the major sources sources each issue:- and some of the case law, minor sources statute (20%) Does not give Gives a Gives a good Gives a very good explanation and demonstrate a Gives an excellent explanation and demonstrate an Accurate an accurate satisfactory explanation of the competent understanding of the substantive law relevant to in-depth understanding of the substantive law of all explanation explanation of explanation of the relevant law on each issue the major and minor issue or the relevant law relevant law on each issue with justification on each issue each issue with some minor errors of the minor errors or or omissions relevant law omissions on each issue (25%) Does not Presents coherent Presents coherent Presents and discusses very thoroughly a coherent Presents and discusses very thoroughly a coherent Application present a well application but argument on application of the law to major issues and can articulate application of the law to all major and minor issues of the argued does not address major issues with argument and/or provide analysis using a range of materials and can effectively use critical skills, logic and relevant law application some significant some minor errors and be able to critically identify and address the inherent supporting materials to marshal arguments, address to each issue matters or omissions. weaknesses in the arguments and counter-arguments counter-arguments and persuade the reader (25%) Analysis is Analysis is Analysis is good Analysis is very good and well organised and flow is Analysis is outstanding, very well organised and flow Presentation poorly reasonably well and well organised effective with almost wholly correct spelling, grammar, is very effective with clearly written and and organised and organised and flow and flow is sentence structure and good referencing sophisticated use of language. Very readable with organisation does not flow is adequate adequate with correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure and of work in a effectively sound referencing excellent referencing logical manner (10%)