Please answer the below questions
MGT556 Instructor: Dr. Hyoun Sook Lim 1 of 2 MGT 556 Final Exam Read the case, titled "Boldly Go: Character Drives Leadership at Providence Healthcare, (the case can be found from the coursepack for MGT556 https://hbsp.harvard.edu/import/959824)" and submit the case review that includes answers for following discussion questions (Due by 11:59pm EST on 12/16). Using concepts learned from "Leading People", analyze Josie Walsh's leadership characteristics, and evaluate the effectiveness of Josie Walsh's leadership characteristics. Using concepts learned from "Strategic Thinking", analyze Josie Walsh's strategic thinking skills. Based on your experience with "Change Management Simulation: Power and Influence V3", explain which scenario of the simulation is closely related to Transformation by Design (TbyD) initiative from the case and why. . Using transformational and transactional leadership theory, analyze Josie Walsh's leadership style, and describe how such leadership style affected stakeholders. Submission guidelines: 1. Use Times New Roman 12-point font, double spaced, and 1-inch (2.5 cm) margin all around 2. The report should be a minimum of 3 pages (excluding tables, figures, and references). Final exam is an essay exam - no bullet points. 3. Follow the APA referencing style. 4. Make sure to use your first and last name as the file name. [Example] Save the file as "Hyoun-Sook Lim.docx" 5. Submit the file via Blackboard (under "Week 16 - Final" folder). Rubric for Final Exam (100 points): Criteria Below Expectations Meet Expectations Exceeds Expectations Contents Incomplete in many respects. . Complete in most respects. . Complete in all respects. (30%) . Reflects few requirements . Reflects most requirements. . Reflects all requirements. Applying . Fails to apply leadership Uses leadership concepts and . Uses leadership Leadership concepts and theories learned theories learned in this course to concepts and theories Theories in this course to analyzing analyzing the case, but lacks learned in this course to (30%) the case. depth. analyzing the case. . Does not demonstrate . Does not sufficiently demonstrate . Sufficiently demonstrate knowledge of leadership. knowledge of leadership knowledge of leadership. MGT556 Instructor: Dr. Hyoun Sook Lim Details . Lacks supporting example . All key points developed and . All major points fully and and/or the example is supported by specific detail; some developed and Examples unrelated to key points. key points may be less developed supported evenly by (40%) . Supporting example is than others (not even or specific evidence, fact, minimal and/or not easily balanced). and examples. interpreted. . Supporting example illustrates the . Supporting evidence is key points but lacks depth understandable and well organized. [Extra Credits - 6 points] Complete the Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 1-1 (available on Blackboard - Check "Week 16-Final" folder) and compare the results with the previous one you completed in Week 1. Based on your results, identify leadership skill areas that (a) you have improved and areas and (2) you need to improve in the future. Then, write down at least two action plans to improve your leadership skills. Be specific
