Please answer these questions as Yes or No and explain in two to three sentences that WHY you consider this as Yes or No

1) Is there diversity between the parties in the following cases?

1. Marlowe from California sues Archer from California in a federal district court in Illinois
2. Carella from New York sues Marlowe (California) and Archer (California)
3. Carella (New York) sues Marlowe (California) and McGee, a Floridian in a federal district court in California
4. Carella (New York), McGee (Florida), and Spencer (Massachusetts) sue Marlowe (California), Archer (California), and Meyer (New York)
5. Marlowe (California) sues Carella (New York) and Marple an Englishwoman
6. Same facts as (e), except that marple, still an Englishwoman, lives in California

2) Marlowe (California) sues Archer (California) in federal court in californiafor damages under a federal firearms control statue. May the court hear the case?

3) Marlowe (California) sues Carella (Newyork) for breach of contract in state court. Can he sue?

4) Marlowe (California) sues Mcgee (Florida) and Archer (California). Marlowe claim against McGee is defamation, a state law claim. His claim against Archer arises from the same incident bus is based on federal law. Will the federal court have jurisdiction?

5)Marlowe (California) sues Mcgee (Florida) for libel. He subsequently learns that Archer (California) co-authored the offending article and amends his complaint to assert a libel claim against Archer as well. Will the federal court have jurisdiction over the action?