Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Please answer these two questions: Case 1 Nanovo, Inc., is a manufacturer of low-cost micro batteries for use in a wide variety of compact electronic

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

Please answer these two questions:

image text in transcribed

Case 1 Nanovo, Inc., is a manufacturer of low-cost micro batteries for use in a wide variety of compact electronic devices such as children's toys, wireless transmitters, and sensors. Growth in the use of these devices has steadily increased, leading to an ever greater demand for Nanovo's products. Nanovo has responded to this increase in demand by expanding its production capacity, more than doubling the firm's size over the past decade.Despite this growth, however, Nanovo does not have sufficient capacity to meet the current demand for its ultra-long-life, low-voltage batteries. You have been asked to evaluate two proposals to expand one of Nanovo's existing plants, and to make a recommendation. Proposal 1 The current plant has a capacity of 25,000 cases per month. The first proposal is for a major expansion that would double the plant's current capacity to 50,000 cases per month. After talking with the firm's design engineers, sales managers, and plant operators, you have prepared the following estimates: Expanding the plant will require the purchase of $3.6 million in new equipment, and entail upfront design and engineering expenses of $3.9 million. These costs will be paid immediately when the expansion begins. Installing the new equipment and redesigning the plant to accommodate the higher capacity will require shutting down the plant for nine months. During that time, the plant's production will cease. After the expansion is finished, the plant will operate at double its original capacity. Marketing and selling the additional volume will lead to $1 million per year in additional sales, marketing, and administrative costs. These costs will begin in the first year (even while the plant is under construction and shut down). . Proposal 2 The engineers have put forth a second proposal for a minor expansion that will increase the firm's capacity by only 50%, to 37,500 cases per month. While the capacity is smaller, such an expansion would be cheaper and less disruptive: The smaller expansion will require only $2.4 million in new equipment and $1.5 million in design and engineering expenses. The existing plant will need to be shut down for only four months. Sales, marketing, and administrative costs will increase by only $500,000. . Nanovo believes that with or without any expansion, the technology used at the plant will be obsolete after six years and will have no salvage value, and the plant itself will need to be completely overhauled at that time. You also have the following additional general information: With or without either proposed expansion, Nanovo will be able to sell all it can produce at an average wholesale price of $80 per case. This price is not expected to change during the next six years. Nanovo has a gross profit margin of 55% on these batteries. Nanovo's average net working capital at the end of each year will equal 15% of its annual . revenue. . . Nanovo pays a 40% corporate tax rate. While all design and engineering costs are immediately deductible as operating expenses, all capital expenditures will be straight-line depreciated for tax purposes over the subsequent six years. Management believes the risk of the expansion is similar to the risk of Nanovo's existing projects, and because Nanovo is all equity financed, the risk of the expansion is also similar to the risk of Nanovo stock. You have the following additional information about the stock: . Nanovo has no debt and has 2 million shares outstanding. The firm's current share price is $75 per share. . Analysts are expecting Nanovo to pay a $3 dividend at the end of this year and to raise its dividend at an average rate of 8% per year in the future. Based on this information, you have been tasked with preparing expansion recommendations for Nanovo. (Using Excel is optional but recommended.) Case Questions 1. Determine the annual incremental free cash flow associated with each expansion proposal relative to the status quo (no expansion). 2. Compute the IRR and payback period of each expansion proposal. Which plan has a higher IRR? Which has a shorter payback period? Case 1 Nanovo, Inc., is a manufacturer of low-cost micro batteries for use in a wide variety of compact electronic devices such as children's toys, wireless transmitters, and sensors. Growth in the use of these devices has steadily increased, leading to an ever greater demand for Nanovo's products. Nanovo has responded to this increase in demand by expanding its production capacity, more than doubling the firm's size over the past decade.Despite this growth, however, Nanovo does not have sufficient capacity to meet the current demand for its ultra-long-life, low-voltage batteries. You have been asked to evaluate two proposals to expand one of Nanovo's existing plants, and to make a recommendation. Proposal 1 The current plant has a capacity of 25,000 cases per month. The first proposal is for a major expansion that would double the plant's current capacity to 50,000 cases per month. After talking with the firm's design engineers, sales managers, and plant operators, you have prepared the following estimates: Expanding the plant will require the purchase of $3.6 million in new equipment, and entail upfront design and engineering expenses of $3.9 million. These costs will be paid immediately when the expansion begins. Installing the new equipment and redesigning the plant to accommodate the higher capacity will require shutting down the plant for nine months. During that time, the plant's production will cease. After the expansion is finished, the plant will operate at double its original capacity. Marketing and selling the additional volume will lead to $1 million per year in additional sales, marketing, and administrative costs. These costs will begin in the first year (even while the plant is under construction and shut down). . Proposal 2 The engineers have put forth a second proposal for a minor expansion that will increase the firm's capacity by only 50%, to 37,500 cases per month. While the capacity is smaller, such an expansion would be cheaper and less disruptive: The smaller expansion will require only $2.4 million in new equipment and $1.5 million in design and engineering expenses. The existing plant will need to be shut down for only four months. Sales, marketing, and administrative costs will increase by only $500,000. . Nanovo believes that with or without any expansion, the technology used at the plant will be obsolete after six years and will have no salvage value, and the plant itself will need to be completely overhauled at that time. You also have the following additional general information: With or without either proposed expansion, Nanovo will be able to sell all it can produce at an average wholesale price of $80 per case. This price is not expected to change during the next six years. Nanovo has a gross profit margin of 55% on these batteries. Nanovo's average net working capital at the end of each year will equal 15% of its annual . revenue. . . Nanovo pays a 40% corporate tax rate. While all design and engineering costs are immediately deductible as operating expenses, all capital expenditures will be straight-line depreciated for tax purposes over the subsequent six years. Management believes the risk of the expansion is similar to the risk of Nanovo's existing projects, and because Nanovo is all equity financed, the risk of the expansion is also similar to the risk of Nanovo stock. You have the following additional information about the stock: . Nanovo has no debt and has 2 million shares outstanding. The firm's current share price is $75 per share. . Analysts are expecting Nanovo to pay a $3 dividend at the end of this year and to raise its dividend at an average rate of 8% per year in the future. Based on this information, you have been tasked with preparing expansion recommendations for Nanovo. (Using Excel is optional but recommended.) Case Questions 1. Determine the annual incremental free cash flow associated with each expansion proposal relative to the status quo (no expansion). 2. Compute the IRR and payback period of each expansion proposal. Which plan has a higher IRR? Which has a shorter payback period

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_step_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_step3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

Takes ownership for turning plans into action.

Answered: 1 week ago