Please answer this it is a grouped question use the bottom for reference
In 2020, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (the I'CDC") (a subagency of the Department of Health and Human Services) issued an order making it a federal offense for a landlord to use the legal eviction process in state court. The logic behind the order is that if people are evicted from their homes, they will live in closer quarters, potentially spreading COVID. The CDC Order is based on a regulation authorizing the CDC director to "take such measures to prevent such spread of the diseases as he/she deems reasonably necessary," when state and local health ofcials have failed to do so. The CDC found its legal authority to create that regulation through the Public Health Services Act, a federal statute (the "Act"). The Act states that the CDC may: \"provide for [I inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest extermination, destruction of animals or articles found to be so infected or contaminated as to be sources of dangerous infection to human beings, and other measures, as in his judgment may be necessary." Under the plain meaning of statutory interpretation, how would a judge likely interpret the Act? The judge would likely nd that the statute ______________ . 0 does not allow the CDC to ban evictions because the statute itself is unconstitutional because it is not allowed under the Commerce Clause of the US constitution 0 allows the CDC to ban evictions because the Department of Health and Human Services's interpretation clearly allows the CDC to issue orders that protect public health 0 does not allow the CDC to issue such an order because the statute was meant to protect the public from pests, such as bugs 0 allows the CDC to ban evictions because COVID is a "dangerous infection to human beings" and the CDC may take "other measures, that in the CDC's judgment may be necessary" During the pandemic, many states halted residential evictions. Texas did not. The State allowed landlords to use a legal eviction process to remove nonpaying tenants. Assuming the CDC's order is a valid exercise of its authority at the time, would a landlord seeking the eviction of a tenant in Texas be able to legally do so? 0 Yes, because Texas's law is permitting evictions defeats the federal law because states have broad police power to regulate for the general welfare 0 No, because federal law defeats state law 0 No, because the landlord would not have jurisdiction in federal court to bring the eviction lawsuit 0 None of the above are true If the US Congress does not approve of the CDC's order, what can it do? 0 Issue an executive order to stop the eviction mortorium O Enact a statute that claries the statutory language under the Act 0 File a lawsuit in federal court 0 None of the above are possible
