Question
Please answer with details Business Law People who borrowed money from Buckeye Check Cashing signed an agreement that included a clause requiring any dispute to
Please answer with details
Business Law
People who borrowed money from Buckeye Check Cashing signed an agreement that included a clause requiring any dispute to go to arbitration. Suit was filed by some customers against Buckeye, claiming their service violated the lending laws of Florida, which would make the agreement invalid. The Florida high court held that because the legality of the contract was in question, the matter had to go to court for review, not arbitration. Do you think that ruling was upheld on review by the U.S. Supreme Court?
Actual case- [Buckeye Check Cashing v.Cardegna, 126 S.Ct. 1204 (2006)]
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started