Please answer with explanation

S. V. F.S.H.L. (December 13, 1994, Doc. No. 282T/93, Platana J. (Ont. Gen. Div.)) S was a 53-year-old man visiting the M.L. resort. He went to the beach to inquire about a fishing expedition. The employee in charge was on the dock. To reach the dock, S had to walk along two sets of two 2' by 8' planks lying end to end from the shore to the dock. The midpoint of the makeshift bridge rested on a floating log. S reached the dock, but on the return trip he fell, suffering severe back and neck strains. He sued the resort. 1. List the 4 elements of negligence and state whether they are present in this case or not. 2. What do you think the decision of the court was? 3. Which legal doctrines apply? Why? (Please include at least 1-2 sentences as explanation for each of the 7 doctrines