Please assist with these

Which of the following is not considered adequate tender of performance? O The debtor pays in legal tender. O An attempt is made to perform the specified service at the specified time and place. O The contract is partially performed but not at the specified time or place. O An attempt is made to perform the specified service. O The debtor attempts to pay in legal tender, but the creditor refuses.Jones entered into a contract with Chan for the purchase of Chan's business. As Jones intended to expand the business and understood that such expansion was contingent on municipal approval to rezone the premises, the contract specified that if the rezoning was not approved, the contract would be terminated and the parties would be placed in their pre-contractual positions. Which of the following is true? O The relevant clause is commonly referred to as a force majeure clause. O The doctrine of frustration does apply, as the outside event was not reasonably anticipated by the parties. O The relevant clause is commonly referred to as a novation clause. O The relevant condition to the contract is commonly referred to as a frustration clause. O Frustration does not apply, as the outside event was anticipated by the parties.Which of the following remedies are often provided for in the body of a contract? O Specific performance and injunctions Liquidated damages and deposit forefeiture O Deposits and specific performance O Accounting and quantum meruit O Rescission and down paymentsWhich of the following statements is false about performance? O A salesman can be required to deliver the car before the buyer is obligated to pay. O A person never has to pay for an ordered product if it does not exactly match the description. O An employer is not obligated to pay an hourly employee if she does not work her shift. O A customer can be required to pay at the time he takes his goods. O It is often important to determine if performance has occurred to determine if the other party is obligated.What is an exemption clause? O A valid contract clause that states the liability of a party is significantly limited or eliminated should that party breach the contract O An invalid contract clause that states the contract is enforceable if one party breaches a condition O An invalid contract clause that exempts the parties from criminal prosecution for actions related to the contract O A valid contract clause that details what actions constitute a fundamental breach O A valid contract clause that limits the property to be soldEdna agrees to mow Danny's lawn every week for five dollars per week. After three weeks, Edna wants to stop mowing and Danny has found another lawn mower for less money. They agree that Edna will no longer mow the lawn and Danny will not owe her any further payment. Can the parties end the contract? O No. There is no consideration on Danny's part to terminate the contract so the agreement is invalid. O Maybe. The contract can be terminated if a court decides the termination is fair to both parties. O No. Contracts cannot be terminated once performance has begun. O Yes. Contracts can be terminated by agreement as long as there is consensus and fresh consideration. O Yes. Contracts can always be terminated by agreement of the parties.In which of the following situations is the contract not discharged by frustration? O An employee is injured and cannot perform the job he was hired to do. O A contractor is hired to roof a home. The home burns down before she can start. O A painter is hired to paint a mural on a school. A tornado completely destroys the school. O A developer buys a property from the town for the purpose of making affordable tiny apartments in an area zoned for tiny dwellings. The zoning board declares no tiny apartments can be built. O Two parties contract for the sale of the goods inside a ship. Before they sign, the contract the ship sank.How have statutes modified the type of situations the frustration principle applies to? O The common law prohibits the principle from applying to renting while statutes allow it. O Statutes prohibit the principle from applying to renting while the common law allows it. O Statutes prohibit the principle from applying to the sale of goods where the goods are destroyed at the seller's place of business while the common law allows it. O The common law prohibits the principle from applying to the sale of land while statutes allow it. O The common law prohibits the principle from applying to employment while the statutes allow it.Which of the following statements about mitigation is false? The victim is not required to risk her life to limit tlte damage cause by the breach. A court can reduce the damage award if the victim made no attempt to lessen the harm caused by the breach. 0 The victim cannot allow his harm to become greater in hopes of a large damage award. 0 The victim of unlawful employment termination must trvto find another job. 0 The victim is required to spend as much as necessary:r to mitigate the damages. Which of the following is not a reason for the court to refuse an equitable remedy? C The victim also breached the contract. O The remedy requested would bankrupt an innocent third party. O The victim waited two years to request a remedy without a valid reason. O The party requesting the remedy also breached the contract. C The breaching party did not intend harm