Please choose the most appropriate term for each scenariol'description. v The defence availabe to a hotdog manufacturer, when someone got food poisoning after eating a hotdog that had been kept in a tent on the beach tor 4 hours. v The legal principle that allows Melanie, a customer at a restaurant, to sue the restaurant after a waiter spills hot coffee on her. v Cristina, a local baker, tells potential customers that her competitor's gluten-free cupcakes are actually made with wheat, unlike Cristina's gluten-tree cupcakes. This is not tme. v Lisa, a lawyer, misses a limitation period, resulting in her client's inability to recover a claim arising out of a car accident. v Jiwan sells O-Whyte purses online. They look just like the purses made by lE.'ii'fl.l'u'hite, a highend brand, but sell for a fraction of the price. v The legal principle that allows a plaintiff to recover the full amount of her claim from any defendantwho has been iound liable, even when liability has been apportioned among the defendants. v Josh and Mohammed play hockey on opposite teams. During the game, Josh skates by Mohammed and says, "I'm coming for you after the game; you better watch out!" v The defence available to a restaurant critic being sued because of a negative restaurant review. v A local autobody shop convinces the head mechanic at Canadian Tire to quit and come work for them, by promising a signing bonus. v The defence available to a ski resort when a an injured skier had signed a waiver when she bought her ticket. a, fair comment B. professional negligence c, product liability D. assault E. vicarious liability F. passing o (3, voluntary assumption of risk H. battery |_ joint and several liability _], contributory negligence K. defamation |__ inducing breach of contract