please do discussion (800 words) on this:

Main objective: Explore the impact of scientific writing quality on the perception of science communication among non-science audiences.

Details: two groups: control and intervention. control group was sixty words and intervention was three hundred and fifty words and written better. he results showed that the percentage of people that got the answer right in the control group was 31.9% and the percentage of people that got the answer right in the intervention group was 17.1%. but the intervention group did better in terms of understanding as shown on the 4th picture. what does this show and mean?

Figures: