Please do the 5 steps of the hypothesis, which are. Pictures are attached. Analysis was done in 2008. Do the 5 steps of the hypothesis, and provide an interpretation from the example below. All information is below!!!! Follow format. Do not answer question "On the basis of these data, would you say that astrologers are correct in their assertion of the power of the stars? Why?".

For your interpretation, you use provide information about pisces and Taurus follow the format. answer the questions below and follow the five steps of hypothesis. thanks. Information is attached and referenced

Mean SEI of Pisces

Mean SEI of Taurus

Mean SEI of your astrological sign

ANOVA significance level

Is the relationship statistically significant?

5 Steps of Hypothesis

1. Null Hypothesis: Ex. There is no difference in the mean age at which individuals have their first child for any education level.

Research Hypothesis: Ex. There is a difference in the mean age at which individuals have their first child for at least two education level groups.

2. Set alpha/level of risk - P< .05

3. Select statistic:

Ex F-test/One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc analysis b/c Age at first child is continuous and education by degree level is categorical with 3 or more categories.

4. Make a decision based on Sig. lvl. (p-value)

If p<.05, reject the null hypothesis of no difference/no relationship

p=.000, so reject the null

5. Interpretation:

Ex. In 2008, there was a statistically significant relationship between the age at which U.S. adults had their first child and educational attainment (F(4,1484) =88.558, p=.000).

Ex. Or... In 2008, there was a statistically significant difference in the average age U.S. adults had their first child depending on their education level (F(4,1484) =88.558, p=.000