please explain these in detail:

A. Title of article B. Thesis/argument C. Their definition/idea of rhetoric D. Definitions of key terms E. Main takeaways F. One question you have about the reading

Introduction Standing at the Intersections of Feminisms, Intersectionality, and Communication Studies Cindy L. Griffin and Karma R. Chvez Despite the widespread belief that intersectionality has arrived, I think that it is important to stop and recognize that this way of looking at and living within the world constitutes a new area of inquiry that is still in its infancy. -Patricia Hill Collins Cor decades, feminist scholars in communication studies have consider the problems inherent in some of its foundational assump- tions, values, theories, and methods. As feminist scholars generally have challenged disciplinary norms, critical race, queer, and postco- lonial feminists continually critiqued feminist scholarship itself for its assumptions and values, especially as they pertain to thinking of all gender in isolation from other systems of power such as race, class, nation, and sexuality. These challenges to the foundations of our discipline, and to feminism, remain necessary: they represent some of our discipline's most important conversations, dilemmas, and struggles. The challenges, and the responses to them, ask scholars to clarify and alter the values and norms of our profession, and they re- flect the ever-contested nature of communication scholarship. Both authors of this introduction have stimulated some of those chal- lenges, participated in them, received them, and listened to others engage them, and we are continually reminded that many of our discipline's most venerated assumptions about how communication and rhetoric work, and how they are at work in the world, reflect a