please give me a wicked problem that is fulfilling this assignment en give short notes bij part 1 tot 4 of the assignment?

Individual take-home exam (draft version) Part 1: Introduce the decision-making process of a wicked problem from a wider societal context (1 page or 500 words) Note: this cannot be the same topic as your group project topic. - 1.1 Provide a short description of the societal context of the wicked problem. (Hint: put in boundaries on the context so it's easier to describe it; e.g.. an XYZ problem in ABC society) - 1.2 Briefly describe what the decision/decision-making process is attempting to address or change in an intra and/or interorganizational decision-making (of which you'll look at the individual in Part 2). Part 2: Individual decision-making (1 page or 500 words): - 2.1 Select a specific individual stakeholder (or stakeholder group) and describe the problem from that stakeholders' perspective. Make explicit at least one of the following: a) positionality/intersectionality; b) values; and c) knowledge they bring in - e.g., engineering, management, life experience/experiential knowledge. (Note: this perspective can be the same or different understanding as the wicked problem you described in the wider societal contexts in part 1). - 2.2 Discuss the potential biases of the individual stakeholder and indicate how their starting point can both positively and negatively potentially impact the wider decision-making (discussed in 1.2). Individual take-home exam (draft version) Part 3: (Joint) multi-actor decision making (1 page or 500 words): - 3.1 From a multi-actor perspective, describe which actors are involved in addressing the problem and discuss how the problem can be approached from an intra or interorganizational perspective. Consider aspects like the possible presence of a common understanding of the problem across actors? Part 4: Impact of the decision on multiple actors and wider society (1 page or 500 words): - 4.1 Provide your own reflection of the decision/decision-making process on multiple actors and wider society. This can include: - Actors that are not directly part of the decision-making process but are impacted by the decision. What are the possibilities and possible value to address this and how this might require changes to the decision-making process. - Consider and include in your answer potential unintended positive or negative consequences of the decision-making process on specific actors and/or wider society and/or the decision-making process (Note: you do not need to discussed impacts on all three- actors, society and the decision-making process. It is sufficient to discuss one of the three and acknowledge interactions with one of the others if relevant)