Please give me the answer as soon as possible. As long as the answer is related to the topic, it doesn't matter if it is wrong. Give me the answer as soon as possible, and I will give you good comments

Question 4 [25 marks! Meng was a salesperson at Cars Warehouse, a used-car dealership. On 20 April 2022, Sophie visited Cars Warehouse to look for a car for her eldest son who had just obtained his driver's license. Meng attended to Sophie. Sophie told Meng that she was looking for a car that was accident-free with low mileage. Meng then showed Sophie a white Toyota Prius. Meng told Sophie that the previous owner of the car had owned it for less than 2 years when he decided to upgrade to a different car model. He showed Sophie the mileage and she said that she was happy with it. Meng also told Sophie that the car was accident-free although he had been informed by the previous owner that the car had been involved in an accident but was repaired. Based on Meng's statement, Sophie signed the sale and purchase agreement and took delivery of the car on the same day. Two days later, Sophie brought the car to be serviced at her own car workshop. After checking through the car thoroughly, the mechanic at the workshop told her that the car had been damaged before. Reguired: (a) Dene vitiating factors and explain the effects vitiating factors may have on contracts. (5 marks) (b) Advise Sophie on the cause of action she could have against Cars Warehouse and the remedies available to her. In your answer, you should provide all relevant LEGAL PRINCIPLES and case laws to be APPLIED to the facts of the case to reach your CONCLUSION. (15 marks)