Please help me finish the next 10 questions about Business Law class. Thank you.

1.Jane runs a business that creates widgets. Jane purchased a new machine that increases Jane's productivity 50%.The machine; however, emits a new high pitched sound that can be heard by the adjoining property owners. Steve runs a pre-school next door to Jane's business.His employees are getting severe headaches from the sound. The children are irritable and the parents are pulling them out of school. Steve sues Jane to get an injunction to stop the machine and he also sues for money damages. Jane claims the noise is not severe enough to cause headaches and in any case cannot stop the sound without removing the machine. What is the likely result?

a.Steve will win monetary damages but will not win an injunction unless he can show that the hardship imposed on him by the noise is greater than the hardship imposed on Jane by removing the new machine.

b. Jane will be forced to invent a better machine.

c. Steve will not win. Noise is a by-product of a factory and he should get used to it.

d. Steve will win an injunction and money damages because a landowner is not allowed to create any noised pollution that travels across the property border.

2.Your company sells a "Navy Seals' Watch."You advertise the watch on TV by showing a military operation with men in camouflage clothing landing on a beach.The leader of the operation looks at his watch and says: "0600, perfect timing from a watch I know I can trust: the Navy Seals' Watch."The U.S. military has a division called the Navy Seals that is famous and well respected. Your company has no connection to Navy.A customer buys your watch and complains when he finds out the watch is not waterproof and that no U.S. Navy Seal uses the watch.Is your ad illegal under consumer protection laws?

a.Yes, because in no case can you show military type images in advertising without the authorization of the FTC under the Lanham Act.

b. Yes, because the ad combined with the name misleads a "reasonable" consumer into thinking the U.S. Navy has endorsed the watch and that it's waterproof.

c.No, because a reasonable consumer understands that we live in a "buyer beware" environment where sellers are allowed to make questionable claims.

d. No, because the ad is a dramatization and a Navy Seal could someday use the watch.

3.Susan runs a business that requires a lot of chemicals and produces a fair amount of waste.Susan places the waste in a waste dumpster provided by her landlord for disposal.What is her responsibility?

a.She is required to determine what the laws are regarding disposal of the particular chemicals she is using and could face fines, penalties and jail time for failure to look into the issue.

b. She is okay until the EPA requests her to treat her waste otherwise, then she needs to following its guidelines.

c. She has met her responsibility by placing the waste in a provided receptacle.

d. She should dump the chemicals into a river running behind her building to remove it entirely from the building area.

4.The government of Canada sets a limit on the amount of beef that can be imported from the United States. This is

a.a dumpling duty.

b.a quota.

c.an antidumping duty.

d. a tariff.

5.Call Center Corporation, a U.S. firm, owns property in India. The government of India seizes the property for a proper public purpose and pays Call Center just compensation. This is

a.expropriation.

b.dumping.

c.confiscation.

d. defalcation.

6.Quik Collection Agency calls Pat several times a day, and sometimes in the middle of the night, about an overdue bill that Regal Sporting Goods turned over to Quik for collection. This is a violation of

a.the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

b.the Truth-in-Lending Act.

c.the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.

d.no federal law.

7.Quackity Quack Company's ad states that its product is "the best on the market today." Because of this ad, the Federal Trade Commission is most likely to

a.issue a cease-and-desist order.

b.require counter advertising.

c.take no action because the ad is using puffery.

d. draft a formal complaint.

8.Bad Guys, Inc. is caught intentionally dumping illegal toxins in a river in order to save money.What could happen to Bad Guys, Inc.?

a.Bad Guys, Inc. will have to pay for any damages caused but there are no criminal penalties for businesses making business decisions.

b. Bad Guys, Inc. will win if it can show that society as a whole benefited more from Bad Guys, Inc. dumping the toxins in the river than the toxins caused damage.

c.Bad Guys, Inc. will have to send the individuals responsible to the EPA for training on the laws surrounding hazardous wastes.

d. Bad Guys, Inc. will face civil penalties and the individuals responsible could face criminal charges and possibly jail time.

9.Sue applies for a job with Regular Stores but is not hired.She believes she was not hired because she is a woman. If she sues what does she have to prove in order to meet a prima facie case and have the burden shift to the employer to prove it did not discriminate?

a.Sue only needs to prove that she is a women in order for the burden to shift to the employer.

b.That she was in a protected class (women), applied and was otherwise eligible for the job only.

c.Sue must prove that employer discriminates against women in order to win the case.

d.That she was in a protected class (women), applied and was otherwise eligible for the job, and the company denied her the job and filled it with someone not in her protected class or the position remains open.

10.Kay and Leo copy and exchange MP3 music files over the Internet without anyone's permission. With respect to songs owned by Natural Recording Company, this is

a.protected expression.

b.copyright infringement.

c.licensing.

d. fair use.