please help me

ie are whether the jobs done by Painter are an executed c0] of Contract Act 1950 explain, when at the desire of the pror. person has done or abstained from doing, or does or absta do or to abstain from doing. something. such act or abstin :ideration for the promise. There is a consideration from Paint I the statement Painter already done his job that been stated in promise of RM 2000 payment. If one party makes a promise her party, when that act is completed, it is executed consider: an executed consideration. .ssue are whether Strong is liable to pay for additional RM 20* v. Myrick where the captain promise to give extra wages if th mded home but refused to pay the extra wages later. The com yes because they were doing no more than their contractual d However, in Hartley v. Ponsonby case the court held tbs that the voyage become dangerous and the remaining seam : original contract which they were free to enter into a new :ood consideration. In this case. Painter only performing an i re is no over and above existing contractual duty. Thus Strong