Please help me with these questions. All questions are complete!

1.

2 DH poms award ed eBook Lakeside Property. Ronnie agreed to act as Sue's agent in nding a piece of lakeside property for her at a good price and in obtaining a loan for her with which to purchase the property. She agreed to pay him $500 for doing so. To assist Ronnie in his duties, Sue disclosed to Ronnie condential information about her nances and debts. Ronnie decided that he needed help and paid Rick $300 to look for property for Sue. Bruce told Ronnie about a great deal on a piece of lakeside property that Bruce had for sale. In fact, the deal was so good that Ronnie purchased the property for himself. When Sue found out about the property Ronnie bought for himself, she complained to Ronnie. He defended himselfon the basis that he was not actually working for Sue when he found out about the deal. At the time. he was playing golf with Bruce. He also told Sue that he had hired Rick for $300 to assist him and that he could not be held liable because he had turned thejob over to Rick. He asked Sue for reimbursement of that amount. Sue red Ronnie. threatening to sue him. Ronnie told Sue that he would counterclaim for the $300 owed to Rick. Only after he was red. Ronnie disclosed to a number of parties information regarding Sue's spending habits that he thought were excessive. Which of the following is the most likely result if Ronnie sues Sue for the $300 paid to Rick? Multiple Choice O Ronnie will win, but only if he can establish that he had either express or implied permission from Sue to assign the duties. O Ronnie will win, but only if he can establish that he had express, implied, or assumed permission from Sue to assign the duties. O Ronnie will lose. O Ronnie will lose, but only if Sue can establish that Rick is incompetent to deal in real estate. X Ronnie will win, but only if he can establish that he had express permission from Sue to assign the duties.7 Roofing Issues. Sally agrees to roof a house for Bob. After doing his research, Bob chooses Sally based on her great reputation for being conscientious and doing good work. Bob knows little about roofing and stays away from all the noise involved. Sally provides her own tools for herself and other workers, sets her own schedule, and charges a flat rate of $10,000 to be paid when the job is completed. Sally hires Trudy, Glen, and Fred to help with the roofing. She pays them an hourly rate, supervises their work, provides them with tools and materials, and sets their schedules. Curious about what is 0/1 going on there, Bob's friend Spencer walks by the house while the roofing is being done. Glen absentmindedly throws some old shingles off the roof and points awarded hits Spencer in the head, resulting in him going to the local emergency room and receiving a couple of stitches in his scalp. Spencer decides to sue all the roofers, Bob, and Sally for his hospital expenses and for pain and suffering. Assuming Glen was negligent, which of the following is the most likely Scored result in a lawsuit against Bob brought by Spencer? eBook Multiple ChoiceO Spencer will win because as the property owner, Bob is liable for any negligence occurring there. O Spencer will lose because Glen is an employee of Sally, who is an independent contractor for Bob. O Spencer will win, but only if it can be established that both Glen and Sally are insolvent and unable to pay any judgment. O Spencer will win because Sally is Bob's employee; therefore, Sally is liable for the negligent acts of anyone working for her. X Spencer will win because Sally is an independent contractor for Bob; therefore, Sally is liable for the negligent acts of anyone working for her.Which of the following was the result on appeal in Iglesia Cristiana La Casa Del Senor, Inc., Etc. v. L.M., the case in the textbook involving the issue of 2 whether a church was liable, pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior, for a sexual assault allegedly committed by a church pastor? 0/1 Multiple Choice points awarded Scored O The church was not liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, but only because the pastor was immediately fired when his actions came to light. eBook O The church was liable to the plaintiff under the doctrine of respondeat superior. O The church was liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, but only if it could be proven that the pastor sexually assaulted more than one person. X The church was liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, but only if it could be proven that the church had knowledge of at least one sexual assault prior to the plaintiff's but failed to remove the pastor from church assignments. O The church was not liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior.Which of the following is true if a principal and an agent have no agreement regarding the amount for which the principal will compensate the agent? Multiple Choice 011 points award ed eElook O A court will appoint a magistrate to set the price. The principal will be allowed to set the price that a court will enforce unless it is unconscionable. A court will assume that the agent agreed to work on a gratuitous basis. A court will calculate compensation according to the customaryfee in the situation. .000 The agent will be allowed to set the price that a court will enforce unless it is unconscionable