Please help me with this and make sure that the word count is 1500, please try your best to help me. I will attach a short answer for your understanding but I want it as more detailed answer to be 1500:

Both Salma and Eshan have a valid contract, but there are potential breaches. Quick Property Repairs Ltd's entitlement to the extra 4,000 depends on the contractual terms. Remedies for breaches involve damages or specific performance, depending on the nature of the breach by each party. Explanation: (a) Validity of Contract between Salma and Eshan: Offer and Acceptance: Salma advertised her house for 400,000. Eshan proposed a roof repair before buying, and Salma counter-offered 380,000, setting a deadline. Eshan accepted the offer by email before the deadline. A contract is formed when an offer is made, accepted, and consideration exists. In this case, both parties expressed an offer, acceptance, and agreed upon consideration. Therefore, there is a valid contract between Salma and Eshan. Breach of Contract: Salma failed to provide the quality of repairs agreed upon, potentially breaching the contract, causing Eshan to withdraw from the purchase. (b) Quick Property Repairs Ltd's Entitlement to Extra 4,000: - Contractual Terms: If the contract between Salma and Quick Property Repairs Ltd specifically mentions extra charges in unforeseen circumstances, they may be entitled to claim the extra 4,000. However, if no such provision exists, they may need to negotiate with Salma for the additional payment. (c) Breach of Contract and Remedies: Salma's Breach: Salma potentially breached the contract by failing to provide satisfactory repairs. Eshan can claim damages or rescind the contract and demand a refund of the deposit. Eshan's Breach: If Eshan fails to pay the balance of 180,000 within the agreed 45 days, he would be in breach of the contract. Salma can seek damages or enforce specific performance to complete the purchase. There is a valid contract between Salma and Eshan, but there might be breaches, particularly on Salma's side regarding the quality of repairs. Quick Property Repairs Ltd's entitlement to the extra 4,000 depends on contractual terms. Remedies for breaches include damages or specific performance based on the specifics of each party's breach of contract. Coursework Question Salma wanted to sell her house and advertised it in the local newspaper on Monday for 400,000. Eshan saw the advertisement and rang Salma to make an appointment to see the house. During the He liked the house but asked Salma whether she would repair the roof before the purchase was completed. On Thursday morning, Eshan received a letter from Salma offering the house to him for 380,000 saying that he had until noon on Friday to think about it. On Friday morning, Eshan emailed Salma to inform her that he would buy the house for the said price. Eshan and Salma agreed on a deposit of 200,000 to be paid and the balance of 180,000 to be paid in 45 days upon completion of roof repairs. Salma contracted with Quick Property Repairs Ltd to repair the roof for 5,000 to be completed within one month. However, the workmen from Quick Property Repairs Ltd discovered that the rear wall of the garage was too weak to sustain the roof repairs. They requested an extra 4,000 to hire machinery to support the wall during the repairs; otherwise, they could not complete the repairs within one month in order for Eshan to complete the purchase of the house. Salma was very unhappy but felt that the work needed to be done and reluctantly agreed to pay the extra 4,000 to complete the repairs. However, once the work was completed, she refused to pay the extra 4,000 and insisted that she would only pay 5,000 as that was the originally agreed price. Eshan inspected the repaired roof but was not happy with the quality of repairs. He refused to complete the purchase of the house and requested his deposit back from Salma. (a) Advise Salma and Eshan whether they have a valid contract. (b) Advise Quick Property Repairs Ltd whether it is entitled to the extra 4,000. (c) Based on the case law discussed in class, advise Salma and Eshan whether either of them is in breach of contract and if yes, what are the remedies available to the other party