Please help me write this paper as my own paper and what I think of it and put my reflection in it

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) mandates that public schools must offer children with disabilities with a free and adequate public education (FAPE) that caters to their specific requirements and helps them become self-sufficient and ready for work in the future. This case is centered on the question of whether or not the Gorham School Department met its commitment under the Individuals with impairments Education Act (IDEA) to offer a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to a student who has several impairments, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a language-based learning disability, and high cognitive capacity.

A pupil must be able to gain substantial educational benefit in order for an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to be considered a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE), as determined by the Rowley Supreme Court ruling. It was highlighted by the court in the Rowley case that this analysis needs to be customized and based on the specific requirements of each individual student. As a result of the Burlington case, the Individualized Education Program (IEP) is required to address all of a student's needs, regardless of whether they are academic, physical, emotional, or social.

In this particular instance, the data demonstrates that the kid battled with major emotional, social, and behavioral challenges that were directly prompted by his experiences in the school system. During the 2005-2006 school year, the school failed to effectively address the student's social and emotional requirements in his Individualized Education Program (IEP) and educational programming. This was the case despite the fact that psychological examinations provided clear proof of these needs and the parents expressed their worry on many occasions.

A qualified psychological examiner who was engaged by the school claimed that the kid shown indicators of stress, sadness, and suicide thinking. The examiner recommended that the youngster's "social-emotional functioning be monitored." According to the findings of an independent neuropsychological examination, the student was suffering from "covert depression" and "highly stressed" and required emotional care. This evaluator cautioned that he was at risk for "serious psychological effects" if adequate remedies were not implemented.

There appeared to be a direct connection between the student's emotional suffering and his failure to access the curriculum and make meaningful academic progress. The student's mother made frequent reports to the school concerning the student's struggles with schoolwork, emotional meltdowns, resistance to attending school, and suicidal remarks, all of which she directly tied to the student's experiences at school. In spite of this, the school took the stance that it had no duty to treat the kid's impaired mental condition until the boy publicly demonstrated these behaviors while he was at school.

The hearing officer came to the proper conclusion that the Individualized Education Program (IEP) did not comply with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act's (IDEA) need to address all areas of need because it did not provide any programming or supports to satisfy the student's severe emotional needs, which were so obviously affecting his ability to benefit from his education. There were some academic services that were offered by the Individualized Education Program (IEP), but the research demonstrates that the student would not be able to effectively access those services without concurrent treatments for his social and emotional impairments.

The hearing officer employed the legal test that parents need to establish that the placement was planned to impart educational value in order to determine whether or not the parents' unilateral private placement at Aucocisco School was permissible. This is in contrast to the requirement that the placement meet the least restrictive environment criterion. Aucocisco was able to successfully handle the student's complex profile by initially concentrating on his need for social skills, emotional control, and strengthening his confidence before focusing on academic weaknesses such as reading and writing. The data suggests that Aucocisco was successful in approaching the student's complicated profile.

A significant increase in the student's emotional well-being, conduct, motivation, and academic success at Aucocisco lends credence to the conclusion that this placement was suitable in accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The youngster, on the other hand, did not get a free appropriate public education (FAPE) offer from the school district since there was no Individualized Education Program (IEP) established for the 2006-2007 school year. As a result, the order that the hearing officer issued mandating compensation for the costs of the private placement that lasted from November 2005 to the present school year was an appropriate remedy.

This case demonstrates that schools are required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to completely assess and treat all aspects of student needs that have an effect on educational achievement. Despite the fact that the school system was confronted with a youngster who displayed major emotional disturbance symptoms, they did not provide any supports or programs that would have targeted this area of profound need. Although it was acknowledged that the kid had academic deficiencies, his capacity to make progress that was substantial was nevertheless hindered by emotional blockages that had not been handled.

According to the persons with disability Education Act (IDEA), schools are required to view children as complex persons in their whole and to develop tailored education that would enable students to benefit despite the myriad of problems that are caused by their disability. In order to access this student's high cognitive capacities, it was necessary to first implement interventions that stabilized his mental health and provided him with developmental skills such as social awareness and emotional control. It was not until Aucocisco had established this core supporting atmosphere that the student was able to commit himself to academics from a place of self-assurance and inner fortitude.