Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Please help with my homework assignment. Specific event is listed in attachment. Case xx 1,Fortheyear-endDecember31,2007,financialstatements,whatamountshouldMrecordasaliability? 2,Fortheyear-endDecember31,2009,financialstatements,shouldMadjustitsliability?Ifso,whatamountshouldberecorded;andshouldtheamountoftheadjustmentbeconsidereda2009eventorapriorperiodadjustment? 3, Should M record the reduction of the previously

Please help with my homework assignment. Specific event is listed in attachment.

Case xx
  1. 1,Fortheyear-endDecember31,2007,financialstatements,whatamountshouldMrecordasaliability?
  2. 2,Fortheyear-endDecember31,2009,financialstatements,shouldMadjustitsliability?Ifso,whatamountshouldberecorded;andshouldtheamountoftheadjustmentbeconsidereda2009eventorapriorperiodadjustment?
  3. 3, Should M record the reduction of the previously recorded loss contingency in 2010 (upon the Court of Appeals overturning the verdict of the jury) or 2011 (once the appellate judges declined W?s petition for a re-hearing)?
image text in transcribed Case 13-08 Accounting for a Loss Contingency for a Verdict Overturned on Appeal M International (\"M\") and W Inc. (\"W,\" a competitor of M) have been engaged in longstanding litigation over a specific patent infringement matter. Below is a summary timeline of specific events that have taken place related to this matter: In May 2007, W filed a claim against M for patent infringement. For the year ended December 31, 2007, management of M determined that a loss for this matter was probable and represented that the estimate of loss was in the range of $15 million to $20 million, with $17 million being the most likely amount of loss within the range. A jury trial took place in September 2009. The jury reached a verdict on September 24, 2009, and a judgment was ordered in favor of W. The judgment required M to pay W $18.5 million. In November 2009, M filed a Notice of Appeal with the Court of Appeals. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals issued a ruling in favor of M's appeal and reversed the lower court's ruling on the matter. This meant that the Court of Appeals overturned the jury verdict and the $18.5 million judgment against M. On January 6, 2011, W filed a petition for a re-hearing before the same panel of appellate judges against the reversal of ruling by Court of Appeals. On February 10, 2011, the appellate judges declined the petition for a re-hearing. On February 28, 2011, management of M determined this matter was closed upon discussions with in-house legal counsel. Required: 1. For the year-end December 31, 2007, financial statements, what amount should M record as a liability? 2. For the year-end December 31, 2009, financial statements, should M adjust its liability? If so, what amount should be recorded; and should the amount of the adjustment be considered a 2009 event or a prior period adjustment? 3. Should M record the reduction of the previously recorded loss contingency in 2010 (upon the Court of Appeals overturning the verdict of the jury) or 2011 (once the appellate judges declined W's petition for a re-hearing)? Copyright 2012 Deloitte Development LLC All Rights Reserved

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Financial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making

Authors: Jerry J. Weygandt, Paul D. Kimmel, Donald E. Kieso

5th Edition

9781118560952, 1118560957, 978-0470239803

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

13. Give four examples of psychological Maginot lines.

Answered: 1 week ago