Please help with Q.6.

to anything? Explain your answer. 6. Carpathian Blood Services Inc (CBSI) entered into a 4. After being subjected to various complaints by custom- Contract two years ago with Vlad Tepes. The relationship ers and competitors, Acme Inc was called before an was unhappy from the outset, and CBSI has decided that administrative tribunal. Following a surprisingly informal it would like to bring matters to an end. It believes that CHAPTER 2 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution 59 it may do so on a number of grounds. First, it appears is not in breach as alleged, he clearly has not fulfilled his that Tepes may have duped the company into creating the promise to transfer a piece of land to the company. In any agreement in the first place. Second, it is quite likely that event, CBSI is worried that it would have a difficult time Tepes breached several terms of the contract. Tepes insists collecting on a judgment, even if a court did find in its that even if he is in breach (which he denies), CBSI has not favour. Tepes has warned the company that it "can't get suffered any loss. That may be true-a court would have to blood out of a stone" and he has vowed that he would never decide the issue. CBSI, however, feels that it has lost money voluntarily pay a cent. The case obviously is still at an early as a result of Tepes's breach of contract. Furthermore, it stage. Nevertheless, CBSI would like to know what sort of believes that Tepes not only breached the contract, but remedies it might receive if it defeated Tepes in court. It also acted so badly that he ought to be punished somehow. also would like to know whether there are any means of (The president of CBSI has gone so far as to call Tepes the forcing a defendant to pay money as ordered by a court. "Dark Prince"!) And third, CBSI says that even if Tepes Please advise the company