Please help with this. ThanksAnswer all the question for me.

11.4 Worksheet 11.4 Worksheet Experimental value for Iring: (Equation 11.7) Show all work and units. Theoretical value for Iring: 2 me Experimental error is calculated by ( 467. 8 9 ) (. 0144) Error = Experimental - Theoretical Percent Error: Theoretical -x 100%. Did the group successfully graph T versus a? Mass of Paper Clip: 1.29 TA initial: Very thin string is used in the previous experiments. Experiment I: Idisc How would thicker string affect experimental results? Mass Weight T Q1 & Q2 (kg) aavg (N (N .m) (rad/$2) rad/$2 0-010 0:098 0:1339 0.023 Experiment III: RMS's Frictional Torque 0'020 0. 1:97 3. 340 1. 0018 0.4582 1.7511 Run 6.544 a friction Tfriction Calculations 0.040 10.392 1 0034 6809 3.35 0 .14 0-060 0.599 . 0051 9.960 9.15 715.059 2 10:15 13.136 0149 0 0 80 04785 . 0067 13.40 6.69 3 0.17 Experimental value for Idisc: Taverage = Theoretical value for Idisc: Percent Error: Is friction a significant source of error in this experi- ment? Why or why not? Did the group successfully graph 7 versus a? TA initial: Does friction have a greater impact the experimental Experiment II: Iring results of the low-, or high-mass runs? Why? Mass Weight T a1 & a2 aavg (kg) (N) (N.m (rad/$2) (rad/$2) 0: 2720 0. 10 10 . 98 1 1.081 0. 27 34 0 273 Can the disparity between Iexperimental and Itheory be 1. 962 1 19 82 10.6516 0. 6 409 0.165 explained by Tfriction? Why or why not? 10.040 /3. 924/-3+96 1.380 1.397 2.804 01060 /5:881 /5. 95 2. 15% 2 .169 1:397 0.080 1783 7183 2.742 2. 746 2. 844