please i need help with theses quastions

One of the major points made in the article "Revisiting the Global Business Ethics Question?" is the Euthyphro question. The author reframes the Socrates' Euthyphro question to "Areprevailinganswerstoquestionsofcross-culturalbusinessethicsconflictaccepted becausetheyare right, or are they right because theyare accepted?". I agree with the author on the idea that we have to approach different cultures with an educated and sensitive attitude, however there are a lot of things I really disagree with here. The author states, "when weencountertensionimmoral standards across borders, we need to be more open than ever to the possibilityof revision." This statement almost seams contradictory to everything else that appears throughout the article. In a global economy, everyone has to be sensitive to one another's cultures. Cross-culture interactions are not one way streets. When the author uses the word "revision", he means to say that we need to be open to changing our own way of doing economics. One thing I've never understood about post-modernists is their unwillingness to accept a good thing at face value, yet they have an uncanny ability to continue to make excuses for systems that have consistently proven to be bad decade after decade since the beginning of the 20th century. Honestly, when it comes to the changing nature of the global economy, I imagine that the ethical standards which govern my future career lie in the hands of whoever controls the internet at the time. If you look across the world, different countries have entirely different ways of handling it. China has a very hands-on high-censorship approach,while the United States is more pro-individual and mostly fostering of free speech.

Please comment on this response. How did this student address values and ethics from a cultural perspective in his or her response?What is one take-away point from this student's response?What other issues need to be considered?

How does the author apply the various theories of ethical decision-making to spam? Does he find spam wrong from an ethical or legal standpoint and do you agree with his analysis?Should more be done to discourage spam and if so, what?Or should people be expected to protect themselves from spam?

How does use of the Internet make people more vulnerable to a variety of unethical and even illegal behaviors? Should more be done to discourage this behavior and if so, what?Or should people be expected to protect themselves?Are there other illegal or unethical behaviors on the Internet that were not covered of Ethics for the Information Age and if so, what are they?

Discuss censorship and freedom of expression in the context of the Internet. How much control should governments have to be able to restrict access or regulate the content of what is available?Has the tendency for greater government control increased over the last decade and if so, why?

Select one of the threats to children caused by networked communications of Ethics for the Information Age. How would you apply the various theories of ethical decision-making to this threat?What is the response from government or the law to this threat and is it effective?What other rights are impacted by action from the government or by the laws intended to address this threat?