Please prepare the Analysis and Conclusion sections of an interoffice legal memorandum based on the research you did in the last module regarding student-on-student sexual harassment under Title IX. You do not need to use all of the cases; use them as appropriate. This is a closed universe problem. Do not do any other research. Do the Analysis and Conclusion sections only and address the strengths and weaknesses of a potential claim under Title IX only. Do not draft an introductory paragraph, Question Presented, Brief Answer, or Facts section. Because the Downeys do not want to initiate a lawsuit, suggest other solutions you can think of when you prepare the memo. Factual Background The parents of Melissa Ann Downey, a 14-year-old student who attends Rockford High School, contacted me about Melissa experiencing sexual harassment by another student at her high school. I believe that Melissa has a viable claim against Rockford School District under Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681), but Melissa and her parents do not want to sue the District except as a last resort due to the prolonged stress of a lawsuit. Melissa dated a 15-year-old student named Brian Douglas from [the most recent] April through August of [the most recent year], prior to entering high school. They had a sexual relationship. This was Melissa's first and only sexual relationship. Melissa ended the relationship during the first week of September because Douglas had become increasingly sexually demanding. Melissa grew uncomfortable with the relationship and told Douglas she no longer wanted anything to do with him. Melissa and Douglas started Rockford High School on [the most recent] September 9th. They were in two classes together and frequently ran into each other near their lockers. Douglas began to follow her around. On occasion, he made suggestive remarks to 2 Melissa, which she ignored. Douglas's actions escalated by September 20 to a point where Melissa became fearful and upset. She started keeping notes regarding Douglas's comments. Douglas's conduct included making sexually derogatory remarks and sexual touching. An administrative aide witnessed the sexual harassment on at least two occasions, and the football coach witnessed another incident. Melissa's friend, Chalin Gardner, reported incidents of harassment to the school counselor. After the counselor had notice of Douglas's actions, Conrad Dreher, the Advanced Computer Skills instructor, had his students, including Douglas, build websites as a class assignment. Douglas built and activated a website that identified Melissa and made sexually derogatory comments about her. Dreher was notified of the website, but the school has failed to stop the harassment. As a result of Rockford's failure to take any action, Melissa has suffered damage to her self-esteem and emotional wellbeing. Most importantly, from a legal standpoint, Rockford's deliberate indifference has deprived Melissa of access to educational benefits. Melissa and her parents may not want to go to court, but they do want the school to stop Douglas from harassing Melissa any further, even if that means removing him from classes, and if need be, removing him from the school. However, they do want to know the likelihood of success should they decide to pursue the matter in court. Case List Davis Next Friend LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Bd. of Educ. Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School Dist. Snelling v. Fall Mountain Regional School Dist. Clark v. Bibb County Bd. of Educ. Reese v. Jefferson School Dist. No. 14J Vaird v. School Dist. of Philadelphia Soper v. Hobe