Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Please read a case below and tell me the trial results and your opinion. Case 2: Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co. (Reference link

Please read a case below and tell me the trial results and your opinion.

Case 2: Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co.

(Reference link : https://scholar.google.co.kr/scholar_case?case=16195960859151005121&q=Weyerhaeuser+Co.+v.+Ross-Simmons+Hardwood+Lumber+Co&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1)

Weyerhaeuser Co. owned six mills processing 65 percent of the red alder logs in the Pacific Northwest. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co. operated a single competing mill. When the prices of the logs rose and those for the lumber fell, Ross-Simmons suffered heavy losses. Several million dollars in debt, the mill closed. Ross-Simmons filed a suit in a federal district court against Weyerhaeuser, alleging attempted monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. Ross-Simmons claimed that Weyerhaeuser used its dominant position in the market to bid up the prices of logs and prevent its competitors from being profitable. Weyerhaeuser argued that the test for predatory pricing applies to a claim of predatory bidding and that Ross-Simmons had not met this standard. From a judgment in the plaintiff's favor, affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Weyerhaeuser appealed.

The United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded. The test that applies to a claim of predatory pricing also applies to a claim of predatory bidding. Both predatory pricing and predatory bidding involves a company's intentional use of pricing for an anticompetitive purpose. Both actions require a company to incur a short-term loss on the possibility of later making a "supracompetitive" profit. Because a "rational" firm is unlikely to "make this sacrifice," both schemes are "rarely tried and even more rarely successful." A failed scheme of either type can benefit consumers. A plaintiff alleging predatory bidding must prove that the defendant's "bidding on the buy side caused the cost of the relevant output to rise above the revenues generated in the sale of those outputs." The plaintiff must also prove that "the defendant has a dangerous probability of recouping the losses incurred in bidding up input prices through the exercise of monopsony power."

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Constitutional Law A Contemporary Approach

Authors: Gregory Maggs, Peter Smith

5th Edition

1684675715, 978-1684675715

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

The default hyperlink color is

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

2. How do I perform this role?

Answered: 1 week ago