Please read Jacobson v. Massachusetts 197 US 11 (1905) and answer these questions 5-7 pages

References: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/

1. What was the question the court was asked to answer?
2. What interpretative approach or approaches did the court take to come to its decision? Originalism or living constitutional approach?
3. For each approach you identify, indicate how you figured that out. For example, you could quote to the sentence or sentences in the decision that helped you come to this conclusion.
4. In this case, the Supreme Court is balancing several interests: individual liberties and power of the state to promote general welfare. Which interest wins out? Would you have come to the same conclusions? Would your conclusion be different because of your thought about how the decision might affect our social life/welfare of the public? Consider current debates about the COVID vaccination.