Please readSmith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 (1974), available athttps://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14723025391522670978&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr

After reading the above case, discuss whether you agree or disagree with the Court's holding that the language in the Massachusetts statute, "treats contemptuously" is unconstitutionally vague. Why do you agree or disagree and what, in your opinion, is the most significant impact of whether it is unconstitutionally vague? Be sure to use a minimum of two resources to support your thoughts.