Question
Please read the following opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals: Bergen v. Baker , 264 Mich. App. 376; 691 N.W.2d 770 (2004):http://milawyersweekly.com/fulltext-opinions/2004/11/18/0753936-bergen-v-baker-et-al/ (from the
Please read the following opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals:Bergen v. Baker, 264 Mich. App. 376; 691 N.W.2d 770 (2004):http://milawyersweekly.com/fulltext-opinions/2004/11/18/0753936-bergen-v-baker-et-al/ (from theMichigan Lawyers Weeklywebsite).
1. Please list the relevant facts of this case. Evidence is relevant if it has "any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence." Michigan Rules of Evidence 401.
2. The law terms asmaterialthose relevant facts that are important and necessary. Among the relevant facts that you have listed in 1 above, please identify the ones that you believe were most important to and necessary for the decision of the court. Based on your reading of Chapter 14 in Unit 3, please state whether you agree with the unanimous opinion of the court (Judges Borrello, Murphy, and Neff). Please provide the specific reasons why you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started