Please read the judgement PRASAD V HUSSEIN (1967) 13 FLR 98 and answer the following questions. http://www.paclii.org/cgi-bin/sinodisp/fj/cases/FJLawRp/1967/50.html?stem=&synonyms=&query=title(Prasad%20and%20Hussein%20)

Question Please read the judgment of the ease Fraser! 1! Hussein (I95?) 13 FLR 93 and answer the following questions: (a) What was the plaintiff's claim, defendant's argument, and plaintiff's counter argument? {b} The court provided two reasons why:F he considered the plaintiff's claim must fail and said one of these two reasons was the more substantial one. What are, the more substantial reasons he gave? (c) The count referred to Masters v Cameras: (I954) 91 C.L.R. 353. in which Dixon CJ discussed three classes of agreement 'on terms of a contractual nature' reached during business negotiations. What are they? Were the three classes of agreement binding contracts, according to Dixon CJ? {d} Did the court think that there was a complete contract in this case? What were his reasons? {e} We discussed a few methods courts have used to clarify incomplete contracts. If you were the judge of this case, would you have used one or more of the discussed methods to clarify the contract