please read theWilliams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.case. Then, answer questions #1 thru 3 following the case, which read: "1. Did the court here say that cross-collateral contracts are necessarily unconscionable? 2. Why is it relevant that the plaintiff had seven children and was on welfare? 3. Why did the defendant have a cross-collateral clause in the contract? What would happen if no such clauses were allowed? Additionally, do you agree with the result? Why or why not?

Must be 150 words