please review my answers

Quiz

Question 1 (1 point)

Saved

What is the difference between specific jurisdiction and general jurisdiction?

Question 1 options:

a)	Specific jurisdiction imposes liability on the defendant only for specific types of claims against the defendant (such as contract claims, tort claims, etc.). General jurisdiction means the defendant is subject to general liability on any claim the plaintiff can bring.

b)

Specific jurisdiction requires the plaintiff's claims to arise out of, or relate to, the defendant's contact with the forum state. General jurisdiction means the defendant's contacts in the forum state are so substantial that they are subject to jurisdiction for claims that do not arise out of or relate to its contacts with the forum state.

c)

General jurisdiction requires the plaintiff's claims to arise out of, or relate to, the defendant's contact with the forum state. Specific jurisdiction means the defendant's contacts in the forum state are so substantial that they are subject to jurisdiction for claims that do not arise out of or relate to its contacts with the forum state.

d)	General jurisdiction requires the plaintiff to establish general liability for any claims against the defendant. Specific jurisdiction means the defendant is subject to liability on the plaintiff's claims if specific elements of the claims are proven.

Question 2 (1 point)

Saved

In Burger King v Rudzewicz, the Court said:

Question 2 options:

a)	If the defendant purposefully directs activities at the forum state, jurisdiction is presumptively reasonable and the plaintiff must prove it does not offend notions of fair play and substantial justice.

b)	If the defendant purposefully directs activities at the forum state, jurisdiction is presumptively reasonable and the court need not consider if it offends notions of fair play and substantial justice.

c)	If the defendant purposefully directs activities at the forum state, jurisdiction is presumptively reasonable and the defendant must prove jurisdiction offends notions of fair play and substantial justice.

d)	If the defendant purposefully directs activities at the forum state, jurisdiction is presumptively reasonable and the defendant must prove it is not liable for the plaintiff's claims.

Question 3 (1 point)

Saved

To establish specific jurisdiction, the plaintiff must:

Question 3 options:

a)	Establish that the defendant acted negligently in the forum state.

b)	Establish that the defendant's contacts outside of the forum state are continuous and systematic.

c)	Establish that the defendant's contacts inside the forum state are continuous and systematic.

d)	Establish that their claims arise out of the defendant's contacts, which are purposefully directed at the forum state so that it is foreseeable that they may be haled into court for harm caused by the contacts.

Question 4 (1 point)

Saved

To establish general jurisdiction, the plaintiff must:

Question 4 options:

a)	Establish that the plaintiff's claims arise out of defendant's contacts that are so continuous and systematic as to render the defendant essentially at home in the forum state.

b)	Establish that the defendant's contacts are so continuous and systematic as to render the defendant essentially at home in the forum state.

c)	Establish that the plaintiff's claims do not arise out of defendant's contacts that are not so continuous and systematic as to render the defendant essentially at home in the forum state.

d)	Establish that the defendant's contacts are not continuous and systematic in the forum state.

Question 5 (1 point)

Saved

Paul and Dan are in a car accident in South Carolina. Dan is on vacation in South Carolina. He lives in Wisconsin. He has never been to South Carolina before and does not plan to ever return. Paul sues Dan for harm from the accident. Which of the following is true?

Question 5 options:

a)	A South Carolina court may assert traditional bases of jurisdiction over Dan because Dan drove in South Carolina.

b)	A South Carolina court may assert specific jurisdiction over Dan because Paul's claims arise out of Dan's contacts with South Carolina and if jurisdiction is found to be reasonable.

c)	A South Carolina court may assert general jurisdiction over Dan because Paul's claims arise out of Dan's contacts with South Carolina and if jurisdiction is found to be reasonable.

d)	A South Carolina court may not assert jurisdiction over Dan.

Question 6 (1 point)

Saved

Paul lives in Colorado. He orders a laptop computer from Dan online while at his home in Colorado. It is sent to his home. Paul is harmed by the product in Nevada when he is visiting that state. Which of the following is true?

Question 6 options:

a)	Dan would be subject to specific jurisdiction in Colorado and Nevada because he purposefully availed himself of the benefits of Colorado by sending the product there, and a laptop is a portable device so it is foreseeable that harm could occur in Nevada.

b)	Dan would be subject to general jurisdiction in Colorado and Nevada because he purposefully availed himself of the benefits of Colorado by sending the product there, and a laptop is a portable device so it is foreseeable that harm could occur in Nevada.

c)	Dan would be subject to specific jurisdiction in Colorado because he purposefully availed himself of the benefits of Colorado by sending the product there, so it is foreseeable that harm could occur there, but he is not subject to jurisdiction in Nevada.

d)	Dan is not subject to jurisdiction in Colorado or Nevada.