Please rewrite the part in RED to match the information in the two table's information.
NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES \& VACANCY \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline KEY INDICATORS & & & & & & & \\ \hline Current Quarter & ReA & Vacancy Rate & Market Rent & Availablity Rate & \begin{tabular}{c} Net Absorption \\ SF \end{tabular} & Detlveries SF & \begin{tabular}{l} Under: \\ Construction \end{tabular} \\ \hline 485 Star & 469,695 & 1.7% & $33,02 & 1.7% & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline 3 Star & 2,762,836 & 10.3% & $24.63 & 10.1% & 3,768 & 0 & 43,600 \\ \hline 182 Star & 1.637 .138 & 11.4% & $22.21 & 12.2% & 852 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Submarket & 4,869,669 & 9.8% & $24,62 & 10.0% & 4,620 & 0 & 43,600 \\ \hline Annual Trends & 12 Month. & \begin{tabular}{l} Historical \\ Average \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{l} Forecast \\ Average \end{tabular} & Peak & When & Trough & Whan \\ \hline Vacancy Change (YOY) & 0.7% & 5.8% & 10.4% & 18.4% & 2001Q3 & 0.5% & 198304 \\ \hline Net Absorption SF & (11.5K) & 74,460 & 9.767 & 430.851 & 199904 & (17),73) & 200103 \\ \hline Deliveries SF & 27.3K & 89,315 & 34,775 & 450,351 & 199904 & 2.420 & 2012 Q3 \\ \hline Rent Growth & 1.2% & 1.7% & 3.4% & 18.8% & 199604 & 206 & 1988 Q2 \\ \hline Sales Volume & 55.7M & $3.4M & N/A & $32.6M & 201201 & 50 & 200003 \\ \hline \end{tabular} NOTE: THE TABLE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND THE DISCUSSION BELOW IS NOT. UTILIZING INFORMATION IN THE TABLE ABOVE, WHICH IS CURRENT FOR DENTON OFFICE, DISCUSS THE MARKET BELOW. USE SAMPLE BELOW AND REGION DISCUSSION THAT WAS GIVEN AS A GUIDE: Office vacancy in the competitive area is notably below that of the region at 7%, which is generally considered to be at the stabilized level. Vacancy declined during the last six months, subsequent to peaking at approximately 11% in the mid-part of 2011. New deliveries in 1 Q10 resulted in an increase in vacancy but the space has subsequently absorbed. Demand has been limited during the last year, absorption being nominal at 6,000SF. Average rents are $20.52/SF, according to a full service lease structure. For relatively new office facilities, rents are commonly according to a NNN Lease structure, relatively new properties ranging from $14.00/SF to $19.00/SF. Similar to retail space, vacancy being at the stabilized level is a positive factor; however, some properties remaining in lease-up are noted and recent demand has been somewhat limited. For those properties with somewhat secondary competitive position, it is noted that rent rates have declined in the last 1.2 years. Even so, the subject property exhibits very good competitive location rating for an office facility. Timing for speculative development that, in accordance with anticipated improvements in the overall economy, estimated at 1-2 years is considered reasonable for the subject property. Maximally Productive: Those uses that are legally permissible and physically possible include common commercial uses, such as office and retail. The timing for development for office/retail space is considered similar based on immediate area market conditions. Competitive location rating is considered good for office and average for retail, the property including frontage on a thoroughfare that provides primary interior neighborhood ingress-egress, being reduced regarding corner position or traffic exposure that better accommodate retail uses in the area. The subject site exhibits size that is well-suited to single-tenant/end-user commercial uses, timing being estimated at the lower-end of the range established for speculative commercial development, say 1 -year. The typical purchaser for a site with characteristics to the subject would be a single-tenant/end-user. Giving consideration to the preceding, the highest and best use of the subject property is to market for single-tenant/end-user related commercial uses while holding for future speculative commercial development
