Please see the attached document which is requesting to chart and answer questions.

BUS4073 4073 Unit 8 Assignment 1 Julian Herrara, a sophisticated investor who is both willing and able to take risk, has just noticed that GoWest Airlines has become the target of a hostile takeover. Prior to the announcement of the offer to purchase the stock for $72 a share, the stock had been selling for 459. Immediately after the offer, the stock rose to $75, a premium over the offer price. Such premiums are often indicative that investors expect a higher price to be forthcoming. Such a higher price could occur if a bidding war erupts for the company or if management leads an employee or management buyout of the firm. Of course, if neither of these scenarios occurs, the price of the stock could fall back to the $72 offer price. In addition, if the offer were to be withdrawn or defeated by management, the price of the stock could fall below the original stock price. Herrara has no reason to anticipate that any of these possibilities will be the final outcome, but he realizes that the price of the stock will not remain at $75. If a bidding war erupts, the price could easily exceed $100. Conversely, if the takeover fails, he expects the price to decline below 455 a share, since he previously believed that the price of the stock was overvalued at $59. With such uncertainty, Herrara does not want to own the stock but is intrigued with the possibility of earning a profit from a price movement that he is certain must occur. Currently there are several threemonth put and call options traded on the stock. Their strike and market prices are as follows: Strike Price Market Price of Call Market Price of Put $50 $26.00 $0.125 55 21.50 .50 60 17.00 1.00 65 13.25 1.75 70 8.00 3.50 75 4.25 6.00 80 1.00 9.75 Herrara decides the best strategy is to purchase both a put and a call option (to establish a straddle). Deciding on a strategy is one thing; determining the best way to execute it is quite another. For example, he could buy the options with the extreme strike prices (i.e., the call at 480 and the put at $50). Or he could buy the options with the strike price closest to the original $72 offer price (i.e., buy the put and call at $70). To help determine the potential profits and losses from various positions, Herrara developed losses from various positions, Herrara developed profit profiles at various stock prices by filing in the following chart for each position: Price of stock Intrinsic Value of Call Profit on Call Intrinsic Value of Put Profit on Put Net Profit $50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 To limit the number of calculations, he decided to make comparisons: (1) the purchase of two inexpensive optionsbuy the call with the $80 strike price and the put with the $60 strike price, (2) the purchase of the options with the $70 strike price, and (3) the purchase of the options with the price closest to the original stock price (i.e., the options with the $60 strike price). Construct Herrara's profit profiles and answer the following questions. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Which strategy works best if a bidding war erupts? Which strategy works best if the hostile takeover is defeated? Which strategy works best if the original offer price becomes the final price? Which of the three positions produces the worst result and under what conditions does it occur? If you were Herrara's financial advisor, which strategy would you advise he establish? Or would you argue that he not speculate on this takeover? EVALUATION OF VARIOUS OPTION TRADING STRATEGIES Price of Stock Intrinsic Value 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Price of Stock Intrinsic Value 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Call Value of Call 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Call Value of Call 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Price of Stock Intrinsic Value 50 15 55 15 60 15 65 15 70 15 75 15 80 15 85 15 Call Value of Call Strategy 1: Long call with strike price $ 80 @ $1, Put Profit on Call Intrinsic Value Value of Put 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 4 0 Long put with strike price $60 @ $1 Profit on Put 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Net Profit 9 4 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 8 3 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 3 Strategy 2: Long call with strike price $ 70 @ $8, Long put with strike price $70 @ $3.5 Put Profit on Call Intrinsic Value Value of Put Profit on Put Net Profit 3 -8 0 3.5 16.5 3 -8 0 3.5 11.5 3 -8 0 3.5 6.5 3 -8 0 3.5 1.5 3 -8 0 3.5 -3.5 3 -3 0 3.5 -3.5 3 2 0 3.5 -3.5 3 7 0 3.5 -3.5 Strategy 3: Long call with strike price $ 60 @ $17, Put Profit on Call Intrinsic Value Value of Put 2 -17 0 2 -17 0 2 -17 0 2 -12 0 2 -7 0 2 -2 0 2 3 0 2 8 0 8.5 3.5 -1.5 -6.5 -11.5 -6.5 -1.5 3.5 Long put with strike price $60 @ $1 Profit on Put 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Net Profit 9 4 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -8 -13 -18 -13 -8 -3 2 7 Answer 1. If bidding war erupts and price exceeds $100, let us see profit profiles of various strategies ( at stock price of $100) : Strategy Profit on Call Profit on Put Net Profit 1 19 -1 18 2 22 -3.5 18.5 3 23 -1 22 Therefore, If a bidding war erupts, and price overshoots $100, strategy 3 will yield the highest net profits Answer 2. If the hostile takeover is defeated and price declines below $55 a share, Strategy 2 will be the best option which can be inferred from the above tables. Answer 3. If original offer price i.e. $72 a share, becomes the final price, then profit profile under various strategies would be as follows: Strategy Profit on Call Profit on Put Net Profit 1 -1 -1 -2 2 -6 -3.5 -9.5 3 -5 -1 -6 Therefore, Strategy 1 would be best under such circumstances as it minimises the losses occuring to the investor. Answer 4. Out of the three given strategies, Strategy 3 can produce the worst results for the investor and that will happen when the stock price is $60 per share. In that scenario, both the purchased options become at the money resulting in losses equal to the sum paid for the two option prices. Answer 5. As Julian Herrarais a sophisticated investor who is both willing and able to take risk, I would advise him to adopt Strategy 3 and derive maximum gains. EVALUATION OF VARIOUS OPTION TRADING STRATEGIES Price of Stock Intrinsic Value 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Call Value of Call 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Strategy 1: Long call with strike price $ 80 @ $1, Put Profit on Call Intrinsic Value Value of Put 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 4 0 Long put with strike price $60 @ $1 Profit on Put 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Net Profit 9 4 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 8 3 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 3 **** Note: All the intrinsic values and time values for the options have been calculated keeping in mind the current stock price of $75 and the strike price and option price of respective call/ put option purchased Price of Stock Intrinsic Value 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Call Value of Call 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Price of Stock Intrinsic Value 50 15 55 15 60 15 65 15 70 15 75 15 80 15 85 15 Call Value of Call Strategy 2: Long call with strike price $ 70 @ $8, Put Profit on Call Intrinsic Value Value of Put 3 -8 0 3 -8 0 3 -8 0 3 -8 0 3 -8 0 3 -3 0 3 2 0 3 7 0 Long put with strike price $70 @ $3.5 Strategy 3: Long call with strike price $ 60 @ $17, Put Profit on Call Intrinsic Value Value of Put 2 -17 0 2 -17 0 2 -17 0 2 -12 0 2 -7 0 2 -2 0 2 3 0 2 8 0 Long put with strike price $60 @ $1 Profit on Put 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Net Profit 16.5 11.5 6.5 1.5 -3.5 -3.5 -3.5 -3.5 Profit on Put 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8.5 3.5 -1.5 -6.5 -11.5 -6.5 -1.5 3.5 Net Profit 9 4 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -8 -13 -18 -13 -8 -3 2 7 Answer 1. If bidding war erupts and price exceeds $100, let us see profit profiles of various strategies ( at stock price of $100) : Strategy Profit on Call Profit on Put Net Profit 1 19 -1 18 2 22 -3.5 18.5 3 23 -1 22 Therefore, If a bidding war erupts, and price overshoots $100, strategy 3 will yield the highest net profits Answer 2. If the hostile takeover is defeated and price declines below $55 a share, Strategy 2 will be the best option which can be inferred from the above tables. Answer 3. If original offer price i.e. $72 a share, becomes the final price, then profit profile under various strategies would be as follows: Strategy Profit on Call Profit on Put Net Profit 1 -1 -1 -2 2 -6 -3.5 -9.5 3 -5 -1 -6 Therefore, Strategy 1 would be best under such circumstances as it minimises the losses occuring to the investor. Answer 4. Out of the three given strategies, Strategy 3 can produce the worst results for the investor and that will happen when the stock price is $60 per share. In that scenario, both the purchased options become at the money resulting in losses equal to the sum paid for the two option prices. Answer 5. As Julian Herrarais a sophisticated investor who is both willing and able to take risk, I would advise him to adopt Strategy 3 and derive maximum gains