Please send typed answers only. The answer must be plagiarism free copied answer will not be acceptable.

QUE 1 Answer in detail (at least 300 words for each question)

TORTS Joe, a concert pianist, was walking down the street when he was struck by Harry, a skateboarder, knocking him down and crushing his hand. When Joe sued Harry for his negligence, claiming the loss of income from his profession (he could never play the piano again), Harry countered with the defense that there is no way he could have anticipated that the person he was going to hit was a concert pianist. 1. Was Harry negligent? Identify and describe each of the four elements of negligence, specifically making reference to the legal tests for each, and apply those elements to this fact scenario. 2. If you conclude that Harry was negligent, explain his likelihood of success in raising the defense that he did.

QUE 2 Answer in detail (at least 300 words for each question)

CONTRACTS Joe offered to sell Harry his car for a specific price, and Harry indicated that he needed some time to think about it. Two days later, Joe sold the car to a third party. That afternoon, Harry phoned Joe and told him that he had decided to accept the offer and that he'd buy the car. Joe told Harry that it was too late; he had sold the car to someone else. Harry said that it had been offered to him first, and he insisted that Joe go through with the contract. 1. Was there a valid contract between Joe and Harry? Your answer must specifically reference each of the elements of a valid contract and describe how each relate to the facts presented above. 2. If you conclude that there was a valid contract, explain the legal liability of each of the parties.