Please specify parts A and B. Thank you so much

is there a possibility that you can try and solve this? All the information for this problem is giving.

Problem 10-07 (Algorithmic) Aggie Power Generation supplies electrical power to residential customers for many U.S. cities. Its main power generation plants are located in Los Angeles, Tulsa, and Seattle. The following table shows Aggie Power Generation's major residential markets, the annual demand in each market (in megawatts or MWs), and the cost to supply electricity to each market from each power generation plant (prices are in $/MW). Distribution Costs City Los Angeles Tulsa Seattle Demand (MWs) Seattle $344.25 $581.75 $47.38 938.00 Portland $350.25 $587.75 $172.13 825.25 San Francisco $181.13 $478.00 $299.88 2378.00 Boise $351.25 $470.00 $291.88 588.75 Reno $236.50 $474.00 $355.25 949.00 Bozeman $403.63 $403.63 $284.88 581.75 Laramie $381.25 $440.63 $381.25 1212.50 Park City $371.25 $371.25 $490.00 727.50 Flagstaff $187.13 $484.00 $602.75 1196.50 Durango $361.25 $301.88 $598.75 1548.75 a. If there are no restrictions on the amount of power that can be supplied by any of the power plants, what is the optimal solution to this problem? Which cities should be supplied by which power plants? What is the total annual power distribution cost for this solution? If required, round your answers to two decimal places. The optimal solution is to produce MWs in Los Angeles, MWs in Tulsa, and MWs in Seattle. The total distribution cost of this solution is $ b. If at most 3900 MWs of power can be supplied by any one of the power plants, what is the optimal solution? What is the annual increase in power distribution cost that results from adding these constraints to the original formulation? If required, round your answers to two decimal places. MWs in Tulsa, and MWs in Seattle. The total distribution cost of this solution is $ The The optimal solution is to produce MWs in Los Angeles, increase in cost associated with the additional constraints is $ Problem 10-07 (Algorithmic) Aggie Power Generation supplies electrical power to residential customers for many U.S. cities. Its main power generation plants are located in Los Angeles, Tulsa, and Seattle. The following table shows Aggie Power Generation's major residential markets, the annual demand in each market (in megawatts or MWs), and the cost to supply electricity to each market from each power generation plant (prices are in $/MW). Distribution Costs City Los Angeles Tulsa Seattle Demand (MWs) Seattle $344.25 $581.75 $47.38 938.00 Portland $350.25 $587.75 $172.13 825.25 San Francisco $181.13 $478.00 $299.88 2378.00 Boise $351.25 $470.00 $291.88 588.75 Reno $236.50 $474.00 $355.25 949.00 Bozeman $403.63 $403.63 $284.88 581.75 Laramie $381.25 $440.63 $381.25 1212.50 Park City $371.25 $371.25 $490.00 727.50 Flagstaff $187.13 $484.00 $602.75 1196.50 Durango $361.25 $301.88 $598.75 1548.75 a. If there are no restrictions on the amount of power that can be supplied by any of the power plants, what is the optimal solution to this problem? Which cities should be supplied by which power plants? What is the total annual power distribution cost for this solution? If required, round your answers to two decimal places. The optimal solution is to produce MWs in Los Angeles, MWs in Tulsa, and MWs in Seattle. The total distribution cost of this solution is $ b. If at most 3900 MWs of power can be supplied by any one of the power plants, what is the optimal solution? What is the annual increase in power distribution cost that results from adding these constraints to the original formulation? If required, round your answers to two decimal places. MWs in Tulsa, and MWs in Seattle. The total distribution cost of this solution is $ The The optimal solution is to produce MWs in Los Angeles, increase in cost associated with the additional constraints is $