Question
please sumbit your oral presentation sources 1.500 words Boos used [1] Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1 [2] Foakes
please sumbit your oral presentation sources 1.500 words
Boos used [1] Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1
[2] Foakes v Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605
Methodology used : Secondary resources /Date
Methodology for Analysing Consideration in Contract Law
Secondary resources because they were easy to access In most cases, secondary resources and data can be through online Google search engines and for this project books from a bookshop and library. ( Oxbridge Essays,2018)
This research was undertaken in 2024 March and involved questioning of current resources of secondary data that helped in summarising and determining the modes of receiving instructions (Perry, 2016). The sources that predominately covered journals of law and publications online, may include, bailii.org and https://www.supremecourt.uk/.
Case Analysis:
Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1:
Pinnel's Case (1602) 5 Co Rep 117:
Foakes v Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605:
Re Selectmove Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 474:
MWB Business Exchange Centre Ltd V Rock Advertising Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 553, [2017] QB 604:
Application and Interpretation:
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started