Please use the information shown above. Perform the following processes in minitab:

PROCESS CAPACITY NORMAL CAPACITY DISCRETE PROCESS CAPABILITY

A garment manufacturing firm specializing in the production of technological business uniforms made of unique fabrics designed to operate well in harsh environments. All textiles are personalized and adapted to the customer's specifications, in addition to being developed for usage in particular situations (high or low temperatures, flame retardant, isothermal, antibacterial, antiviral, and/or anti-tear). This organization is distinguished by having a high level of quality control in its operations and so being able to satisfy the needs of customers in such a specialized sector. One of the most important aspects to consider in the premium line are the critical sewing specifications, because they must comply with the highest sewing standards to avoid possible cracks that could compromise the fabric's characteristics and functionality in situ, in addition to being manufactured in a specialized fabric for the pharmaceutical industry. On this production line, a series of daily inspections are now being performed, and a divergence from the goal quality criterion (95 percent) is beginning to be noted. During the assessments, all of the requirements for each garment are validated, as well as the appearance and feel of the garment when it is given to the final client. The inspection procedure is carried out on a daily basis, with a sampling taken at each operation and then documented. The data gathered by the Quality Assurance team comprises their discoveries throughout the last four weeks of manufacturing. Within the report, we will see weekly tabs where quality incidents are established on a continual basis by person and criterion, as illustrated below: LUN MAR MIE JUEV VIER SB TOTALES SLIFICACIO No. NOMBRE RECH REY TIGTE REY RECH REV RECH IND REY RECH TY TOLLE 60 0 60 0 REV WEISON 290 0 60 0 2 RECH REY 0 60 0 60 2 O 1 1 # OPERACIN LIPERALULIN 53-2 PEGAR BOTON 53-2 PEGADO DE PUNO 53-2 PEGADO DE CUELLO 53-2 Dobladillo $3-2 Pegado de Botn delantero 53-2 Pegado de puo 53-2 Cerrado de costado 54 Deshebrado 54 DESHEBRADO 54 Detallado RECH REY RECH 0 500 0 50 0 0 50 2 1 50 0 0 50 O 30 0 13 0 60 60 29 40 20 10 20 10 0 1 1. 0 0 2349 Gissele Olivares Sandoval 1138 Mara Esther Muro Garca 2188 Sandra Lizbeth Aguilar Casillas 2716 MARIA JANETH FALCON CORTES 3191 FATIMA JANETTE RODRIGUEZ CANIZALES 2178 MARLENE GOMEZ GAMA 3248 VERONICA MARTINEZ FRANCISCO 3159 ADRIANA YAZMIN RENTERIA GARCIA 1028 Rosa Mara Garca Rivera 3198 MAYRA JANETH SANCHEZ SANCHEZ 60 30 30 20 20 30 2 6 1 3 3 m 290 159 150 118 55 80 0 100.00% 99.31% 96.23% 99.33% 97.46% 100.00% 97.50% 95.71% 15 2 0 15 0 10 0 == 0 30 2 0 1 0 2 10 0 1 10 1 1 30 0 3 lololo 70 70 10 0 10 0 10 10 30 0 30 0 10 30 0 100.00% 100.00% 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 150 0 All occurrences are recorded separately in each of the criteria examined per garment and can be allocated to the operator in order to calculate his own performance index. Hilo incorrecto PPP incorrecta N Tensin desequilibrada Costura con nudo Costura cada Costura zafada 0 Costura patinada Costura interrumpida 00 Costura a la vista Costura chueca COSTURA Costura brincada Bolsas chuecas ZI Falta de remache Pelusa atrapada en la costura Pestana Tejido daado o Pliegues por costura Mal casado Consumo disparejo NN 1 Tela Brillada Entretela mal fusionada Pieza volteada N Puntas deformes Mal refilado N Mangas volteadas Talla incorrecta Cuellos de N VARIOS Pinzas voll Etiqueta d 8 Mangas di 8 Sisa Desfa No cumple 3 Camisa ca Ojal sin rel Ojal zafad Ojal sin a viu Sin ojal Sin Botn Following that, the adjacent tabs provide the Yield calculation per line segment and total line based on the grouping of all individual occurrences by defect code. REGISTRO DE RECHAZOS ViroLine MARTES MIERCOLES JUEVES OP'S EN PROCESO: OP'S EN PROCESO: OP'S EN PROCESO: # DEFECTO OPERACIN # DEFECTO OPERACIN DEFECTO OPERACIN 3lCostura cada Sobrecosido de cuell 1 Costura chueca Encuarte 5 Costura cada Sobrecosido de cuell 3 Costura cada Sobrecosido de puo 5 Costura cada Sobrecosido de cuell 6 Costura cada Sobrecosido de pund 3 Costura brincada Cerrado de costado 4 Costura cada Sobrecosido de puol 3 Costura zafada Cerrado de costado 6 Costura chueca Dobladillo 4 Costura zafada Cerrado de costado 9 9 Costura chueca Dobladillo 2 Costura zafada Sobrecosido de mang 5 Costura chueca Dobladillo 6 Costura zafada Sobrecosido de mand Finally, all of the data is compiled, yielding personal quality indices and individual contributions to the final outcome. TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: 600 17 26 YIELD: 92.83% The following is a summary of the information: Week 1: LUNES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MARTES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MIERCOLES 600 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 43 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: JUEVES 540 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: 25 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: : 58 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: : VIERNES 670 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: 760 50 68 YIELD: YIELD: 92.83% YIELD: 89.26% YIELD: 88.66% YIELD: 91.05% ENTRADAS 2570 SALIDAS 2325 REPROCESOS 245 YIELD 90.47% Week 2: LUNES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MARTES 750 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 13 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 31 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 44 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MIERCOLES 750 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 6 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: JUEVES 760 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 23 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: VIERNES 800 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 25 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 18 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 43 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: : 810 27 20 47 YIELD: 94.13% YIELD: 94.27% YIELD: 93.68% YIELD: 94.63% YIELD: 94.20% ENTRADAS 3870 SALIDAS 3645 REPROCESOS 225 YIELD 94.19% Week 3: LUNES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MARTES 590 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 24 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 67 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: : MIERCOLES 700 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 29 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 28 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: JUEVES 610 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 32 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 69 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: VIERNES 560 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 33 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DE SHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 72 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: 690 39 16 55 YIELD: 88.64% YIELD: 91.86% YIELD: 88.69% YIELD: 87.14% YIELD: 92.03% ENTRADAS 3150 SALIDAS 2830 REPROCESOS 320 YIELD 89.84% Week 4: 690 LUNES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DE SHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MARTES 640 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 20 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 20 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MIERCOLES 720 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 20 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 23 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 43 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: JUEVES 570 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 16 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 32 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 49 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: VIERNES 630 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 54 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 58 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 112 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: YIELD: 95.63% YIELD: 94.03% YIELD: 91.58% YIELD: : 82.22% YIELD: 89.86% ENTRADAS 3250 SALIDAS 2949 REPROCESOS 301 YIELD 90.74% Total acceptances and denials per person, operation, and week: SEMANA 1 SEMANA 2 SEMANA 3 SEMANA 4 SEMANA 5 TOTALES CALIFICACION No! NOMBRE REV RECE REYRE REY RECRERE RE REIRE RECI IND OPERACI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 10 0 0 TOTALES 1085 1380 134 0 191 0 150 0 0 1085 613 43.50% WEEKLY AUDIT REPORT: Week 1: LUN MAR MIE JUE VIE SB TOTALES SECCIN REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REC REY RECH REY 40 0 0 0 0 60 0 60 4 60 5 3 12 0 0 0 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 40 0 220 0 Seccin 1- (Cuello y Puo) Seccin 2-(Manga, Delantero y Espalda) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 1) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 2) Seccin 4 - Terminado & al al 8 0 0 16 60 12 60 25 60 7 50 14 290 60 30 74 23 0 0 0 6 20 6 30 5 0 2 0 4 80 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 11 0 0 9 275 18 | COMODINES TOTALES % CALIDAD PLANTA 65 2 155 26 83.23% 60 3 260 | 25 90.38% 60 2 270 38 85.93% 60 2 240 18 92.50% 30 160 1085 138 31 80.63% Week 2: LUN MAR MIE JUE VIE SB TOTALES SECCIN REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY REC REY RECH 0 0 60 1 4 1 1 70 5 0 1 250 12 60 60 60 60 0 0 60 0 1 1 1 1 70 0 0 0 2 Seccin 1 - Cuello y Puo) Seccin 2 - (Manga, Delantero y Espalda) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 1) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Linea 2) Seccin 4 - Terminado 250 320 60 20 60 11 60 10 60 6 60 8 20 6 61 0 0 5 0 19 4 3 4 59 31 8 3 7 3 20 12 20 4 4 14 10 6 10 12 5 4 1 62 22 0 0 5 0 1 0 6 COMODINES TOTALES 0 31 0 190 0 25 0 211 0 0 232 0 20 0 44 0 12 74 28 190 18 941 11 134 % CALIDAD PLANTA 58.11% 85.26% 86.84% 91.47% 91.38% 72.73% Week 3: LUN MIE JUE VIE SB TOTALES MAR REV RECH SECCION REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV REC REV RECH 60 3 60 4 60 5 60 3 0 1 20 1 1 260 17 60 11 60 1 1 60 0 0 0 20 0 260 13 60 60 60 11 20 16 15 60 16 60 8 20 14 280 80 Seccin 1 - Cuello y Puo). Seccin 2- (Manga, Delantero y Espalda) Seccin 3 - Ensamble - Linea 1) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 2) Seccin 4 - Terminado COMODINES 28 14 20 3 7 7 9 20 8 20 5 20 5 115 44 6 4 2. 4 6 7 6 11 6 2 10 8 36 36 30 0 20 170 1 30 0 244 82.38% 30 223 30 0 192 28 85.42% 0 37 TOTALES 0 0 28 43 30 1 236 39 83.47% 110 1.121 191 116 16 86.21% % CALIDAD PLANTA 83.41% 74.55% Week 4: LUN MAR MIE JUE VIE SB TOTALES SECCIN REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV REC REV RECH 60 5 60 4 4 60 5 60 13 60 3 0 0 0 300 30 60 1 60 0 60 1 60 0 60 0 0 0 300 2 Seccin 1 - (Cuello y Puo) Seccin 2 - (Manga, Delantero y Espalda) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Linea 1) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 2) Seccin 4 - Terminado 20 8 40 12 40 15 40 20 10 5 0 0 150 60 20 0 40 3 40 5 40 14 10 4 0 0 150 26 10 4 0 2 0 4 10 7 40 5 0 0 60 22 COMODINES 2 30 2. 2 40 4 0 0 0 160 10 20 190 30 230 40 220 U TOTALES 20 230 23 32 250 58 17 1,120 150 % CALIDAD PLANTA 89.47% 90.00% 86.09% 76.80% 92.27% Based on this data, I devised a plan of action to improve the existing condition. Assume a $10 assembly cost per gown and a 1.7:1 rework factor for repairs. Determine your current problem scenario, success measures, possible and fundamental causes for the remedy, and predicted savings. A garment manufacturing firm specializing in the production of technological business uniforms made of unique fabrics designed to operate well in harsh environments. All textiles are personalized and adapted to the customer's specifications, in addition to being developed for usage in particular situations (high or low temperatures, flame retardant, isothermal, antibacterial, antiviral, and/or anti-tear). This organization is distinguished by having a high level of quality control in its operations and so being able to satisfy the needs of customers in such a specialized sector. One of the most important aspects to consider in the premium line are the critical sewing specifications, because they must comply with the highest sewing standards to avoid possible cracks that could compromise the fabric's characteristics and functionality in situ, in addition to being manufactured in a specialized fabric for the pharmaceutical industry. On this production line, a series of daily inspections are now being performed, and a divergence from the goal quality criterion (95 percent) is beginning to be noted. During the assessments, all of the requirements for each garment are validated, as well as the appearance and feel of the garment when it is given to the final client. The inspection procedure is carried out on a daily basis, with a sampling taken at each operation and then documented. The data gathered by the Quality Assurance team comprises their discoveries throughout the last four weeks of manufacturing. Within the report, we will see weekly tabs where quality incidents are established on a continual basis by person and criterion, as illustrated below: LUN MAR MIE JUEV VIER SB TOTALES SLIFICACIO No. NOMBRE RECH REY TIGTE REY RECH REV RECH IND REY RECH TY TOLLE 60 0 60 0 REV WEISON 290 0 60 0 2 RECH REY 0 60 0 60 2 O 1 1 # OPERACIN LIPERALULIN 53-2 PEGAR BOTON 53-2 PEGADO DE PUNO 53-2 PEGADO DE CUELLO 53-2 Dobladillo $3-2 Pegado de Botn delantero 53-2 Pegado de puo 53-2 Cerrado de costado 54 Deshebrado 54 DESHEBRADO 54 Detallado RECH REY RECH 0 500 0 50 0 0 50 2 1 50 0 0 50 O 30 0 13 0 60 60 29 40 20 10 20 10 0 1 1. 0 0 2349 Gissele Olivares Sandoval 1138 Mara Esther Muro Garca 2188 Sandra Lizbeth Aguilar Casillas 2716 MARIA JANETH FALCON CORTES 3191 FATIMA JANETTE RODRIGUEZ CANIZALES 2178 MARLENE GOMEZ GAMA 3248 VERONICA MARTINEZ FRANCISCO 3159 ADRIANA YAZMIN RENTERIA GARCIA 1028 Rosa Mara Garca Rivera 3198 MAYRA JANETH SANCHEZ SANCHEZ 60 30 30 20 20 30 2 6 1 3 3 m 290 159 150 118 55 80 0 100.00% 99.31% 96.23% 99.33% 97.46% 100.00% 97.50% 95.71% 15 2 0 15 0 10 0 == 0 30 2 0 1 0 2 10 0 1 10 1 1 30 0 3 lololo 70 70 10 0 10 0 10 10 30 0 30 0 10 30 0 100.00% 100.00% 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 150 0 All occurrences are recorded separately in each of the criteria examined per garment and can be allocated to the operator in order to calculate his own performance index. Hilo incorrecto PPP incorrecta N Tensin desequilibrada Costura con nudo Costura cada Costura zafada 0 Costura patinada Costura interrumpida 00 Costura a la vista Costura chueca COSTURA Costura brincada Bolsas chuecas ZI Falta de remache Pelusa atrapada en la costura Pestana Tejido daado o Pliegues por costura Mal casado Consumo disparejo NN 1 Tela Brillada Entretela mal fusionada Pieza volteada N Puntas deformes Mal refilado N Mangas volteadas Talla incorrecta Cuellos de N VARIOS Pinzas voll Etiqueta d 8 Mangas di 8 Sisa Desfa No cumple 3 Camisa ca Ojal sin rel Ojal zafad Ojal sin a viu Sin ojal Sin Botn Following that, the adjacent tabs provide the Yield calculation per line segment and total line based on the grouping of all individual occurrences by defect code. REGISTRO DE RECHAZOS ViroLine MARTES MIERCOLES JUEVES OP'S EN PROCESO: OP'S EN PROCESO: OP'S EN PROCESO: # DEFECTO OPERACIN # DEFECTO OPERACIN DEFECTO OPERACIN 3lCostura cada Sobrecosido de cuell 1 Costura chueca Encuarte 5 Costura cada Sobrecosido de cuell 3 Costura cada Sobrecosido de puo 5 Costura cada Sobrecosido de cuell 6 Costura cada Sobrecosido de pund 3 Costura brincada Cerrado de costado 4 Costura cada Sobrecosido de puol 3 Costura zafada Cerrado de costado 6 Costura chueca Dobladillo 4 Costura zafada Cerrado de costado 9 9 Costura chueca Dobladillo 2 Costura zafada Sobrecosido de mang 5 Costura chueca Dobladillo 6 Costura zafada Sobrecosido de mand Finally, all of the data is compiled, yielding personal quality indices and individual contributions to the final outcome. TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: 600 17 26 YIELD: 92.83% The following is a summary of the information: Week 1: LUNES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MARTES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MIERCOLES 600 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 43 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: JUEVES 540 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: 25 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: : 58 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: : VIERNES 670 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: 760 50 68 YIELD: YIELD: 92.83% YIELD: 89.26% YIELD: 88.66% YIELD: 91.05% ENTRADAS 2570 SALIDAS 2325 REPROCESOS 245 YIELD 90.47% Week 2: LUNES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MARTES 750 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 13 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 31 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 44 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MIERCOLES 750 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 6 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: JUEVES 760 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 23 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: VIERNES 800 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 25 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 18 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 43 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: : 810 27 20 47 YIELD: 94.13% YIELD: 94.27% YIELD: 93.68% YIELD: 94.63% YIELD: 94.20% ENTRADAS 3870 SALIDAS 3645 REPROCESOS 225 YIELD 94.19% Week 3: LUNES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MARTES 590 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 24 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 67 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: : MIERCOLES 700 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 29 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 28 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: JUEVES 610 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 32 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 69 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: VIERNES 560 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 33 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DE SHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 72 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: 690 39 16 55 YIELD: 88.64% YIELD: 91.86% YIELD: 88.69% YIELD: 87.14% YIELD: 92.03% ENTRADAS 3150 SALIDAS 2830 REPROCESOS 320 YIELD 89.84% Week 4: 690 LUNES TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DE SHEBRADO TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MARTES 640 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 20 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 20 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: MIERCOLES 720 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 20 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 23 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 43 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: JUEVES 570 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 16 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 32 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 49 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: VIERNES 630 TOTAL DE BATAS PRODUCIDAS: 54 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS DESHEBRADO 58 TOTAL DE RECHAZOS AUDITORIA: 112 TOTAL DE REPROCESOS: YIELD: 95.63% YIELD: 94.03% YIELD: 91.58% YIELD: : 82.22% YIELD: 89.86% ENTRADAS 3250 SALIDAS 2949 REPROCESOS 301 YIELD 90.74% Total acceptances and denials per person, operation, and week: SEMANA 1 SEMANA 2 SEMANA 3 SEMANA 4 SEMANA 5 TOTALES CALIFICACION No! NOMBRE REV RECE REYRE REY RECRERE RE REIRE RECI IND OPERACI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 10 0 0 TOTALES 1085 1380 134 0 191 0 150 0 0 1085 613 43.50% WEEKLY AUDIT REPORT: Week 1: LUN MAR MIE JUE VIE SB TOTALES SECCIN REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REC REY RECH REY 40 0 0 0 0 60 0 60 4 60 5 3 12 0 0 0 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 40 0 220 0 Seccin 1- (Cuello y Puo) Seccin 2-(Manga, Delantero y Espalda) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 1) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 2) Seccin 4 - Terminado & al al 8 0 0 16 60 12 60 25 60 7 50 14 290 60 30 74 23 0 0 0 6 20 6 30 5 0 2 0 4 80 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 11 0 0 9 275 18 | COMODINES TOTALES % CALIDAD PLANTA 65 2 155 26 83.23% 60 3 260 | 25 90.38% 60 2 270 38 85.93% 60 2 240 18 92.50% 30 160 1085 138 31 80.63% Week 2: LUN MAR MIE JUE VIE SB TOTALES SECCIN REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY RECH REY REC REY RECH 0 0 60 1 4 1 1 70 5 0 1 250 12 60 60 60 60 0 0 60 0 1 1 1 1 70 0 0 0 2 Seccin 1 - Cuello y Puo) Seccin 2 - (Manga, Delantero y Espalda) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 1) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Linea 2) Seccin 4 - Terminado 250 320 60 20 60 11 60 10 60 6 60 8 20 6 61 0 0 5 0 19 4 3 4 59 31 8 3 7 3 20 12 20 4 4 14 10 6 10 12 5 4 1 62 22 0 0 5 0 1 0 6 COMODINES TOTALES 0 31 0 190 0 25 0 211 0 0 232 0 20 0 44 0 12 74 28 190 18 941 11 134 % CALIDAD PLANTA 58.11% 85.26% 86.84% 91.47% 91.38% 72.73% Week 3: LUN MIE JUE VIE SB TOTALES MAR REV RECH SECCION REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV REC REV RECH 60 3 60 4 60 5 60 3 0 1 20 1 1 260 17 60 11 60 1 1 60 0 0 0 20 0 260 13 60 60 60 11 20 16 15 60 16 60 8 20 14 280 80 Seccin 1 - Cuello y Puo). Seccin 2- (Manga, Delantero y Espalda) Seccin 3 - Ensamble - Linea 1) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 2) Seccin 4 - Terminado COMODINES 28 14 20 3 7 7 9 20 8 20 5 20 5 115 44 6 4 2. 4 6 7 6 11 6 2 10 8 36 36 30 0 20 170 1 30 0 244 82.38% 30 223 30 0 192 28 85.42% 0 37 TOTALES 0 0 28 43 30 1 236 39 83.47% 110 1.121 191 116 16 86.21% % CALIDAD PLANTA 83.41% 74.55% Week 4: LUN MAR MIE JUE VIE SB TOTALES SECCIN REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV RECH REV REC REV RECH 60 5 60 4 4 60 5 60 13 60 3 0 0 0 300 30 60 1 60 0 60 1 60 0 60 0 0 0 300 2 Seccin 1 - (Cuello y Puo) Seccin 2 - (Manga, Delantero y Espalda) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Linea 1) Seccin 3 - (Ensamble - Lnea 2) Seccin 4 - Terminado 20 8 40 12 40 15 40 20 10 5 0 0 150 60 20 0 40 3 40 5 40 14 10 4 0 0 150 26 10 4 0 2 0 4 10 7 40 5 0 0 60 22 COMODINES 2 30 2. 2 40 4 0 0 0 160 10 20 190 30 230 40 220 U TOTALES 20 230 23 32 250 58 17 1,120 150 % CALIDAD PLANTA 89.47% 90.00% 86.09% 76.80% 92.27% Based on this data, I devised a plan of action to improve the existing condition. Assume a $10 assembly cost per gown and a 1.7:1 rework factor for repairs. Determine your current problem scenario, success measures, possible and fundamental causes for the remedy, and predicted savings