Please write the first part which is News Article Analysis for me. Thank you. Link of the article: https://phys.orgews/2023-03-framework-honest-behavior.html

Instructions You will hand-in two individual 8-10 page \"Management in the news\" assignments during the term. Each Assignment has two components: Analysis and Reflection. Part | - News Article Analysis (7-8 pages) Select a current news article or news clip from a reputable source (within the past 2 years) that addresses an organizational behaviour topic. Your task is to analyze the implications of the article using relevant theories and concepts from the course. Discuss why you think this is or is not important, relevant, interesting etc. and how it may impact the workplace. The assignment is designed to make you think about what you have learned in this course thus far, and to use this knowledge for understanding the implications of organizational behaviour in organizations. Provide a link to the article, video, etc.in the references section of your submission. Part Il Reflection (1-2 pages) Reflection is a critical method of learning. | want you to think deeply about course material and the topic covered in the article you read. Each paper should critique and analyze material. These reflections should not simply summarize a topic, but rather be critical and open reflections of the material, such as by integrating relevant content from this course, and incorporating your own personal experiences or application to your life. Your reflection can range from thoughts about everyday experiences and interactions (a really nice customer/server), prior decisions (why did | choose Odette?), and future goals (what will | do differently?). Make it personal! Make it resonate! 1. Reflect on this topic as it relates to your personal/work life or plans for the future (e.g., Now | understand that | have high continuance commitment at my current job, but low affective commitment). This can include a critical consideration to how our discussion changed your perceptions of a topic or if you are still uncertain or disagree about an idea. | want to see thoughtfulness. 2. Explain why this reflection matters/what you have learned (e.g., Having high continuance commitment means... for me. This matters because...). 3. Integrate relevant concepts from lecture and/or assigned readings to support your learning. MARCH 6, 2023 New framework on honest behavior suggests it is a process that goes beyond not lying Editors' notes by Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University facts facts facts facts facts fac facts facts facts facts facts facts fa. facts facts facts far facts fo facts to facts facts facts f facts fac facts facts facts facts facts ts acts facts facts facts facts facts acts facts facts cts facts facts fact facts facts fact acts facts facts cts facts facts fact facts facts facts sets facts facts acts facts facts fa facts facts facts acts facts facts fo facts fad facts facts facts Credit: Pixabay/CCO Public Domain s facts facts fo ets facts facts s +s facts facts acts facts fact. "cts fact Most people value honesty while also recognizing that it is sometimes beneficial to be dishonest. This tension leads individuals to engage in behaviors that stretch the boundaries of honest behavior, such as strategically avoiding information, dodging questions, and making misleading statements. In a new article, researchers reviewed work from a range of disciplines to telling the truth or lying. develop a framework that highlights how honest behavior encompasses much more than the commonly held view of eitherThe article, by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), the University of Chicago, Northwestern University, and Wake Forest University, is in the Academy of Management Annals. Based on their findings, the authors say the narrow focus on honest content, which largely reduces the study of honesty to lying versus truth-telling, is problematic and connected to modern day societal challenges such as the spread of misinformation. Instead, they suggest that honest behavior is a complex phenomenon that is more than a single behavior focused on truth-telling; it is a broader relational act of communication. "Honest behavior has relational elementsfor example, fostering an accurate understanding in others through what we disclose and how we communicateand intellectual elements for example, evaluating information for accuracy, searching for explains Taya Cohen, Associate Professor of Organizational Behavior and Business Ethics at CMU's Tepper School of Business, who coauthored the article. Researchers reviewed nearly 170 empirical articles published between 2000 and 2021, covering the fields of management, organizational behavior, applied psychology, and business highlighted that the process of being fully honest begins with communicators forming accurate beliefs based on a process of evaluation, search and incorporation (intellectual honesty), sharing their beliefs truthfully without lying (honest content), ensuring that they provide sufficient disclosure without leaving out relevant information (honest disclosure), and doing so in a way that allows listeners to form an accurate understanding of the message (honest delivery). As part of this process, the authors outlined findings regarding the antecedents and consequences for each of these facets of honest behavior, concluding that engaging in honest behavior has consequences for both communicators and listeners, on an individual, social and organizational level. Additionally, to generate ideas to guide future research, the authors highlighted findings from a variety of other fields, such as social psychology other prominent concepts in the management literature (e.g., voice/silence, psychological safety) that have not included discussions of honesty. The framework has practical implications for individuals and organizations wishing to increase honesty, the authors suggest. It can be used to encourage people to seek truthful information, update their beliefs based on this information, and attempt to foster true beliefs in others as part of the information-sharing process, to create a safe and inclusive workplace environment. "We must consider not just what people do or do not say, but also how beliefs are formed, the extent to which beliefs are updated when needed, and whether recipients walk away from communication exchanges with the same beliefs that communicators meant to convey," says Benny Cooper, a Post- Doctoral Fellow in Organizational Behavior and Theory at CMU's Tepper School of Business, who led the study. "It is only by understanding all these nuanced honesty-related behaviors that we can develop effective methods for cultivating the virtue of honesty in people and organizations." More information: Binyamin Cooper et al, Honest Behavior: Truth- Seeking, Belief-Speaking, and Fostering Understanding of the Truth in Others, Academy of Management Annals (2023). DOI: 10.5465/annals.2021.0209 Provided by Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University (2 Overall Grading criteria: * Demonstrate a thorough understanding of organizational behaviour concepts (correctly identify, define, review, and apply the key concepts). e Correctly integrate your understanding of course concepts and theories with relevant issues or events (correctly explain where and how the theory/concepts apply to the article). * Produce a well-crafted document. You are expected to present your ideas in a coherent and persuasive manner. Your paper will be reviewed for spelling, grammar, layout, formal writing, and referencing. All written assignments are expected to be well organized and readable. * You must have all components of the assignment included: Summary, Connection to OB, and Concluding Insights. Use additional headings as appropriate. Part I: News Article Analysis Total Score (out Scale/Range Connection to OB (Application) 'Writing Fluency, Spelling, and Grammar of 40): Management in the News Assignment Marking Rubric - 8w | 0 s7 0 00 46 00| @00 13 00| Meets Standards Approaching Standards Below Standards Unsatisfactory Comments Information from news article is clearly summarized. Many supporting details address the who, what, where, when, why or how questions. A detailed, high level overview of the article Insightfully makes multiple connections to OB concepts or issues. Appropriately uses OB terminology and identifies relevant OB topics. Applies more details from the article and demonstrates understanding of the relevance of course concepts Effective and engaging use of word choice to make writing interesting. Formal English is used. Writing is clear and easy to understand. No grammar and/or spelling errors Information from news article is clearly summarized but lacks some detail. Few supporting details address the who, what, where, when, why, or how questions. Makes a few connections to OB concepts or issues. Uses several OB terms and identifies relevant OB topics, however some applications are missing. Uses a variety of vocabulary. A few inaccuracies, but these do not interfere with understanding. Very few run-on sentences. Essay is fairly easy to understand. Very few grammar and/or spelling errors Summary may be unclear or incomplete. There is a need for more supporting details. Attempts to make appropriate connections to OB concepts and issues but lacks sufficient detail to establish a full connection. Does not use appropriate terminology from textbook. Information is simply copied from the text with limited individual application. Shows some use of varied word choice, but with some inaccuracies. Some run-on sentences Some difficulty in understanding the essay. Some grammar and/or spelling errors Too much information was copied from the article or important details are left out. Details or summary may be confusing. Connection is inappropriate to the content of the article. Information is simply copied from the text with no individual application. Careless or inaccurate word choice, which obscures meaning. Informal language is used. Frequent run on sentences. Significant difficulty understanding the essay. Frequent grammar and/or spelling errors which significantly interfere with understanding