pls do all or dont do them

Question 9 (1 point) Saved What type of argument is the following: Premise 1: Jahan and Jorgen are Ryerson grads who know how to write a memo, how to diagram arguments, and how to classify inductive arguments. Premise 2: The best explanation for for premise 1 is that Ryerson teaches the mentioned skills. Conclusion: Ryerson teaches the mentioned skill Survey Simple Induction Inference to the best explanation Generalization Analogy What is the problem with the following argument? Premise 1: If Cardiz is a racist, he is the right person to increase diversity in our firm. Premise 2: Cardiz is not the right person to increase diversity in our firm. Conclusion: Cardiz is not a racist Premise 2 is unacceptable There is no problem The logic is weak (argument is invalid) Premise 1 is unacceptable What type of argument is the following: Premise 1: Jahan and Jorgen are Ryerson grads who took BUS 221, know how to write a memo, and how to diagram arguments. Premise 2: Jorgen knows how to classify inductive arguments. Conclusion: Jahan probably knows how to classify inductive arguments. Simple Induction Analogy Survey Inference to the best explanation Generalization